Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 14, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 29, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment

Faust-Christmann CA, Taetz B, Zolynski G, Zimmermann T, Bleser G

A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(9):e13703

DOI: 10.2196/13703

PMID: 31573919

PMCID: 6792022

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment

  • Corinna Anna Faust-Christmann; 
  • Bertram Taetz; 
  • Gregor Zolynski; 
  • Tobias Zimmermann; 
  • Gabriele Bleser

Background:

Deep and slow abdominal breathing is an important skill for the management of stress and pain. However, despite multiple proofs on the effectiveness of biofeedback, most breathing apps remain limited to pacing specific breathing patterns, without sensor feedback on the actual breathing behavior.

Objective:

To fill this gap, an app named Breathing-Mentor was developed. This app combines effective visualization of the instruction with biofeedback on deep abdominal breathing, based on the mobile phone’s accelerometers. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate users’ feedback and breathing behavior during initial contact with the app.

Methods:

To reveal the possible effects of biofeedback, two versions of the mobile app were developed. Both contained the same visual instruction, but only the full version included additional biofeedback. In total, 40 untrained participants were randomly assigned to one of the two versions of the app. They had to follow the app’s instructions as closely as possible for 5 min.

Results:

The group with additional biofeedback showed an increased signal-to-noise ratio for instructed breathing frequency (0.1 Hz) compared with those using visual instruction without biofeedback (F1,37=4.18; P<.048). During this initial contact with the full version, self-reported relaxation effectivity was, however, lower than the group using visual instruction without biofeedback (t37=−2.36; P=.02), probably owing to increased cognitive workload to follow the instruction.

Conclusions:

This study supports the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating biofeedback in the Breathing-Mentor app to train abdominal breathing. Immediate effects on relaxation levels should, however, not be expected for untrained users.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Faust-Christmann CA, Taetz B, Zolynski G, Zimmermann T, Bleser G

A Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(9):e13703

DOI: 10.2196/13703

PMID: 31573919

PMCID: 6792022

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.