Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 5, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 20, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of the Effects of Coaching and Receipt of App Recommendations on Depression, Anxiety, and Engagement in the IntelliCare Platform: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Tomasino KN, Kaiser SM, Alam N, Karr C, Vergara J, Gray EG, Kwasny MJ, Lattie EG

Comparison of the Effects of Coaching and Receipt of App Recommendations on Depression, Anxiety, and Engagement in the IntelliCare Platform: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(8):e13609

DOI: 10.2196/13609

PMID: 31464192

PMCID: 6737883

Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Coaching and Receipt of App Recommendations on Depression, Anxiety, and App Use in the IntelliCare Platform

  • David C. Mohr; 
  • Stephen M. Schueller; 
  • Kathryn Noth Tomasino; 
  • Susan M. Kaiser; 
  • Nameyeh Alam; 
  • Chris Karr; 
  • Jessica Vergara; 
  • Elizabeth G. Gray; 
  • Mary J. Kwasny; 
  • Emily G. Lattie

ABSTRACT

Background:

IntelliCare is a modular platform that includes 12 simple apps targeting specific psychological strategies for common mental health problems such as depression and anxiety.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of two methods of maintaining engagement with the IntelliCare Platform, coaching and receipt of weekly recommendations to try different apps, on depression, anxiety, and app use.

Methods:

301 participants with depression or anxiety were randomized to one of four 8-week treatment arms and were followed for 6 months post-treatment. The trial used a 2X2 factorial design (coached vs. self-guided and weekly app recommendations vs. no recommendations) to compare engagement elements.

Results:

Participants showed significant reductions in the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 across all treatment arms (Ps<0.001). Coached treatment produced larger GAD-7 reductions relative to self-guided (p=0.03) but the effects for the PHQ-9 did not reach significance (P=0.058). There was a significant interaction between receiving recommendations and time for the PHQ-9 (P=0.04) but no effects for GAD-7 (Ps>0.58). The median number of app sessions over 8 weeks was 218 (IQR 126, 325) and the median time to last use of any app was 56 days (IQR 54, 57). These did not vary significantly across treatment arms (Ps>0.06). Number of apps downloaded was greater among those receiving coaching (P<.001) but did not vary by recommendation arm. 84.1% of participants continued using IntelliCare apps for 92 days during post-treatment.

Conclusions:

IntelliCare produced strong engagement with apps across all treatment arms. Coaching was associated with stronger anxiety outcomes, and receipt of recommendations enhanced depression outcomes. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02801877


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mohr DC, Schueller SM, Tomasino KN, Kaiser SM, Alam N, Karr C, Vergara J, Gray EG, Kwasny MJ, Lattie EG

Comparison of the Effects of Coaching and Receipt of App Recommendations on Depression, Anxiety, and Engagement in the IntelliCare Platform: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(8):e13609

DOI: 10.2196/13609

PMID: 31464192

PMCID: 6737883

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.