Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 2, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 5, 2019 - May 31, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Recommendations to Improve the Implementation of and Engagement With Portals in Acute Care: Hospital-Based Qualitative Study

Greysen SR, Magan Y, Rosenthal J, Jacolbia R, Auerbach AD, Harrison JD

Patient Recommendations to Improve the Implementation of and Engagement With Portals in Acute Care: Hospital-Based Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(1):e13337

DOI: 10.2196/13337

PMID: 31934868

PMCID: 6996719

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient Recommendations to Improve the Implementation of and Engagement With Portals in Acute Care: Hospital-Based Qualitative Study

  • S Ryan Greysen; 
  • Yimdriuska Magan; 
  • Jamie Rosenthal; 
  • Ronald Jacolbia; 
  • Andrew D Auerbach; 
  • James D Harrison

Background:

The inclusion of patient portals into electronic health records in the inpatient setting lags behind progress in the outpatient setting.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to understand patient perceptions of using a portal during an episode of acute care and explore patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to portal use during hospitalization.

Methods:

We utilized a mixed methods approach to explore patient experiences in using the portal during hospitalization. All patients received a tablet with a brief tutorial, pre- and postuse surveys, and completed in-person semistructured interviews. Qualitative data were coded using thematic analysis to iteratively develop 18 codes that were integrated into 3 themes framed as patient recommendations to hospitals to improve engagement with the portal during acute care. Themes from these qualitative data guided our approach to the analysis of quantitative data.

Results:

We enrolled 97 participants: 53 (53/97, 55%) women, 44 (44/97, 45%) nonwhite with an average age of 48 years (19-81 years), and the average length of hospitalization was 6.4 days. A total of 47 participants (47/97, 48%) had an active portal account, 59 participants (59/97, 61%) owned a smartphone, and 79 participants (79/97, 81%) accessed the internet daily. In total, 3 overarching themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of interviews with these patients during their hospital stay: (1) hospitals should provide both access to a device and bring-your-own-device platform to access the portal; (2) hospitals should provide an orientation both on how to use the device and how to use the portal; and (3) hospitals should ensure portal content is up to date and easy to understand.

Conclusions:

Patients independently and consistently identified basic needs for device and portal access, education, and usability. Hospitals should prioritize these areas to enable successful implementation of inpatient portals to promote greater patient engagement during acute care.

ClinicalTrial:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00102401; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01970852


 Citation

Please cite as:

Greysen SR, Magan Y, Rosenthal J, Jacolbia R, Auerbach AD, Harrison JD

Patient Recommendations to Improve the Implementation of and Engagement With Portals in Acute Care: Hospital-Based Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(1):e13337

DOI: 10.2196/13337

PMID: 31934868

PMCID: 6996719

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.