JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death internationally. In Canada, more than half of all health care spending is used for managing chronic diseases. Although studies have shown that the use of advanced features of electronic medical record (EMR) systems improves the quality of chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM), a 2012 international survey found that Canadian physicians were the least likely to use two or more EMR system functions. Some studies show that maturity vis-à-vis clinicians’ EMR use is an important factor when evaluating the use of advanced features of health information systems. The Clinical Adoption Framework (CAF), a common evaluation framework used to assess the success of EMR adoption, does not incorporate the process of maturing. Nevertheless, the CAF and studies that discuss the barriers to and facilitators of the adoption of EMR systems can be the basis for exploring the use of advanced EMR features.

Objective:

To explore the factors that Ontario primary care physicians identified as influencing their use of advanced EMR features to support CDPM. Furthermore, to extend the CAF to include primary care physicians’ perceptions of how their EMR use for performing clinical tasks has matured.

Methods:

Guided by the CAF, directed content analysis was used to explore the barriers and facilitating factors encountered by primary care physicians when using EMR features. Participants were primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada who use EMRs. Data were coded using categories from the CAF.

Results:

Nine face-to-face interviews were conducted from January 2017 to July 2017. Dimensions from the CAF emerged from the data and one new dimension was derived: physicians’ perception of their maturity of EMR use. Primary care physicians identified key factors that impacted their use of advanced EMR features: performance of EMR features, information quality of EMR features, training and technical support, user satisfaction, provider’s productivity, personal characteristics and roles, cost benefits of EMR features, EMR systems infrastructure, funding, and government leadership.

Conclusions:

The CAF was extended to include physicians’ perceptions of how their use of EMR systems had matured. Most participants agreed that their use of EMR systems for performing clinical tasks had evolved since their adoption of the system and that certain system features facilitated their care for patients with chronic diseases. However, several barriers were identified and should be addressed to further enhance primary care physicians’ use of advanced EMR features to support CDPM.