Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Dec 28, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 31, 2018 - Jan 6, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 24, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences

Kushalnagar P, Paludneviciene R, Kushalnagar R

Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2019;6(1):e13233

DOI: 10.2196/13233

PMID: 30855233

PMCID: 6431824

Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients

  • Poorna Kushalnagar; 
  • Raylene Paludneviciene; 
  • Raja Kushalnagar

ABSTRACT

Background:

The advent of new rehabilitation and assistive technologies has led to the creation of Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) as an accessible communication technology for deaf and hard of hearing (D/HH) patients. While there has been a rapid growth in the use of VRI technology by healthcare providers, there is scant published information on VRI users and their satisfaction. Current, timely data is needed to understand D/HH patients’ use and satisfaction with the quality of VRI technology in healthcare settings.

Objective:

To investigate the national trends of D/HH patients’ satisfaction with the quality of video remote interpreting (VRI) in health settings and recommend actions to improve VRI quality and D/HH patient satisfaction with using VRI in healthcare settings.

Methods:

Secondary data related to D/HH adults’ experiences with using VRI service in medical setting was drawn from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) in American Sign Language that was administered to an U.S. sample of D/HH adults between 2016 and 2018.

Results:

In our VRI-user sample (N=555, all in the United States) who answered questions about VRI usage in health between 2016 and 2018, only 41% were satisfied with the quality of VRI technology service. Respondents with fewer years of education or those who were male were more likely to rate VRI quality as acceptable. After adjusting for covariates in a binary regression analysis, D/HH patient’s self-reported interference of VRI with disclosure of health information increased patient dissatisfaction with the quality of VRI technology service by threefold.

Conclusions:

To increase D/HH patient satisfaction with VRI technology service in healthcare and rehabilitation settings, special attention needs to be given to video technology, as the use of sign language requires high fidelity video for optimal communication between the interpreter and patient. To promote the D/HH patient’s willingness to disclose medical information through VRI, the interpreter must be highly skilled in both expressive and receptive communication and have the requisite background in medicine and rehabilitation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kushalnagar P, Paludneviciene R, Kushalnagar R

Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2019;6(1):e13233

DOI: 10.2196/13233

PMID: 30855233

PMCID: 6431824

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.