Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Dec 18, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 21, 2018 - Feb 15, 2019
Date Accepted: Jan 23, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 12, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Clinical Decision Support System (KNOWBED) to Integrate Scientific Knowledge at the Bedside: Development and Evaluation Study

MARTÍNEZ-GARCÍA A, NARANJO-SAUCEDO AB, RIVAS-GONZÁLEZ J, ROMERO-TABARES A, MARÍN-CASSINELLO AM, ANDRÉS-MARTÍN A, SÁNCHEZ-LAGUNA FJ, VILLEGAS-PORTERO R, PÉREZ-LEÓN FDP, MORENO-CONDE J, PARRA-CALDERÓN CL

A Clinical Decision Support System (KNOWBED) to Integrate Scientific Knowledge at the Bedside: Development and Evaluation Study

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(3):e13182

DOI: 10.2196/13182

PMID: 33709932

PMCID: 7991993

KNOWBED: A Clinical Decision Support System to integrate Scientific Knowledge at the bedside

  • Alicia MARTÍNEZ-GARCÍA; 
  • Ana Belén NARANJO-SAUCEDO; 
  • José RIVAS-GONZÁLEZ; 
  • Antonio ROMERO-TABARES; 
  • Ana María MARÍN-CASSINELLO; 
  • Anselmo ANDRÉS-MARTÍN; 
  • Francisco José SÁNCHEZ-LAGUNA; 
  • Román VILLEGAS-PORTERO; 
  • Francisco De Paula PÉREZ-LEÓN; 
  • Jesús MORENO-CONDE; 
  • Carlos Luís PARRA-CALDERÓN

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) paradigm requires the development of skills of healthcare personnel in the efficient search of the literature and the application of formal rules for the evaluation of evidence contained in the medical literature. Incorporating this methodology into the decision-making process of routine clinical practice allows to improve the patients’ healthcare, leading to increase the patient safety and to optimize resource efficiency.

Objective:

To enable physicians to carry out decision-making processes based on EBM during their regular clinical practice in an agile method.

Methods:

Two basic components integrate the KNOWBED system: a knowledge station (web application) and a mobile application. KNOWBED system has been tested in in the context of the bronchiolitis pathology from the Paediatrics Unit from the “Virgen Macarena” University Hospital (Seville, Spain). The system was evaluated using two indicators: usability and effectiveness.

Results:

A technological system (KNOWBED system) has been designed, developed and validated to support clinical decision making in mobility based in standards that has been incorporated into the practice of physicians. From this tool, physicians can consult existing scientific knowledge at bedside and access of recommendations of clinical protocols established based on EBM.

Conclusions:

KNOWBED system is considered a useful and innovative system by physicians. The surveys of usability filled in by the users of the system show that it is particularly easy to access the knowledge bases. However, this article sets out certain improvements to be made in future experiences.


 Citation

Please cite as:

MARTÍNEZ-GARCÍA A, NARANJO-SAUCEDO AB, RIVAS-GONZÁLEZ J, ROMERO-TABARES A, MARÍN-CASSINELLO AM, ANDRÉS-MARTÍN A, SÁNCHEZ-LAGUNA FJ, VILLEGAS-PORTERO R, PÉREZ-LEÓN FDP, MORENO-CONDE J, PARRA-CALDERÓN CL

A Clinical Decision Support System (KNOWBED) to Integrate Scientific Knowledge at the Bedside: Development and Evaluation Study

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(3):e13182

DOI: 10.2196/13182

PMID: 33709932

PMCID: 7991993

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.