Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 13, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 17, 2018 - Feb 11, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 24, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patients’ Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study

McAlearney AS, Sieck CJ, Gaughan A, Fareed N, Volney J, Huerta TR

Patients’ Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(6):e13126

DOI: 10.2196/13126

PMID: 31172960

PMCID: 6592494

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patients’ Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study

  • Ann Scheck McAlearney; 
  • Cynthia J Sieck; 
  • Alice Gaughan; 
  • Naleef Fareed; 
  • Jaclyn Volney; 
  • Timothy R Huerta

Background:

Patient portals are a promising instrument to improve patient-centered care, as they provide patients information and tools that can help them better manage their health. The implementation of portals in both the inpatient and outpatient setting gives health care providers an opportunity to support patients both during hospitalization and after discharge. Thus, there is a need to better understand how inpatient and outpatient portals are used across care contexts.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine patients’ perceptions of using inpatient and outpatient portals across the care settings, including how they used the portals and the benefits and concerns associated with portal use.

Methods:

This study was conducted in a large Midwestern academic medical center consisting of seven hospitals. We interviewed 120 patients who had used an inpatient portal during their hospitalization, at 15 days and 6 months postdischarge, to determine their perspectives of portal use in both hospital and outpatient settings. Interview transcripts were analyzed inductively and deductively by using team coding processes consistent with a grounded theory approach.

Results:

Interviews focused on three main areas of portal use: experience with the portal features, perceived benefits, and concerns. Responses at 15 days (n=60) and 6 months (n=60) postdischarge were consistent with respect to perceptions about portal use. Patients identified viewing their health information, managing their schedule, and communicating with providers as notable activities. Convenience, access to information, and better engagement in care were indicated as benefits. Concerns were related to technology issues and privacy/security risks.

Conclusions:

Implementation of inpatient portals as a complement to outpatient portals is increasing and can enable patients to better manage aspects of their care. Although care processes vary substantively across settings, the benefits of convenience, improved access to information, and better engagement in care provide opportunities for portal use across care settings to support patient-centered care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McAlearney AS, Sieck CJ, Gaughan A, Fareed N, Volney J, Huerta TR

Patients’ Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(6):e13126

DOI: 10.2196/13126

PMID: 31172960

PMCID: 6592494

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.