Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 11, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 14, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 29, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Questions and Physician Responses in a Chinese Health Q&A Website: Content Analysis

Hong Z, Deng Z, Evans R, Wu H

Patient Questions and Physician Responses in a Chinese Health Q&A Website: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(4):e13071

DOI: 10.2196/13071

PMID: 32297872

PMCID: 7193435

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient Questions and Physician Responses in a Chinese Health Q&A Website: Content Analysis

  • Ziying Hong; 
  • Zhaohua Deng; 
  • Richard Evans; 
  • Haiyan Wu

Background:

Since the turn of this century, the internet has become an invaluable resource for people seeking health information and answers to health-related queries. Health question and answer websites have grown in popularity in recent years as a means for patients to obtain health information from medical professionals. For patients suffering from chronic illnesses, it is vital that health care providers become better acquainted with patients’ information needs and learn how they express them in text format.

Objective:

The aims of this study were to: (1) explore whether patients can accurately and adequately express their information needs on health question and answer websites, (2) identify what types of problems are of most concern to those suffering from chronic illnesses, and (3) determine the relationship between question characteristics and the number of answers received.

Methods:

Questions were collected from a leading Chinese health question and answer website called “All questions will be answered” in January 2018. We focused on questions relating to diabetes and hepatitis, including those that were free and those that were financially rewarded. Content analysis was completed on a total of 7068 (diabetes) and 6685 (hepatitis) textual questions. Correlations between the characteristics of questions (number of words per question, value of reward) and the number of answers received were evaluated using linear regression analysis.

Results:

The majority of patients are able to accurately express their problem in text format, while some patients may require minor social support. The questions posted were related to three main topics: (1) prevention and examination, (2) diagnosis, and (3) treatment. Patients with diabetes were most concerned with the treatment received, whereas patients with hepatitis focused on the diagnosis results. The number of words per question and the value of the reward were negatively correlated with the number of answers. The number of words per question and the value of the reward were negatively correlated with the number of answers.

Conclusions:

This study provides valuable insights into the ability of patients suffering from chronic illnesses to make an understandable request on health question and answer websites. Health topics relating to diabetes and hepatitis were classified to address the health information needs of chronically ill patients. Furthermore, identification of the factors affecting the number of answers received per question can help users of these websites to better frame their questions to obtain more valuable answers.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hong Z, Deng Z, Evans R, Wu H

Patient Questions and Physician Responses in a Chinese Health Q&A Website: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(4):e13071

DOI: 10.2196/13071

PMID: 32297872

PMCID: 7193435

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.