Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 11, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 11, 2018 - Dec 21, 2018
Date Accepted: Feb 9, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Health professions’ digital education: a review of learning theories in RCTs by the Digital Health Education collaboration
ABSTRACT
Background:
Learning theory is an essential component for designing an effective educational curriculum. Reviews of existing literature consistently lack sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of digital interventions for health professions’ education, which may reflect disconnections between learning theories, curriculum design, use of technology, and outcome evaluation.
Objective:
We aim to identify, map and evaluate the use of learning-theories in designing and implementing intervention trials of health professions’ digital education, as well as to highlight areas for future research on technology enhanced education via the establishment of a development framework for practice and research.
Methods:
Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2007 and 2016 (ten years).
Results:
A total 874 RCTs on digital health education were identified and categorized into online-offline, mobile digital education, and simulation-based modalities for pre and post-registration health professions’ education. Of these, 242 studies were randomly selected for methodological review and thematic analysis. Data were extracted by one author using a standardized form, with a 20% random sample extracted by a second author in duplicate. One-third (33.4%; 81/242) studies reported single or multiple learning theories in design, assessment, conceptualization or interpretation of outcomes of the digital education interventions. Commonly reported learning theories were problem-based learning (19.7%), social learning theory (13.5%), and cognitive theory of multimedia learning (12.3%). Most of these studies assessed knowledge (48.8%), skills (25.6%), and performance (24.3%) as primary outcomes with non-validated assessment tools (62.4%). Studies with reported learning theories (p=0.002) and validated instruments (p=0.006) have shown effective acquisition of learning outcomes.
Conclusions:
We proposed a development framework to safeguard robustness and integrity of the design and implementation of future digital education programmes for the training of health professions.
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.