Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Nov 20, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 22, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Into the Wild: Selecting and Managing Sensors for Longitudinal Behavioral Research in Non-controlled Settings
ABSTRACT
Background:
Recent advances in mobile technologies for sensing human biosignals are empowering researchers to collect real-world data outside of the laboratory in natural settings where participants can perform their daily activities with minimal disruption. These new sensing opportunities usher a host of challenges and constraints for both researchers and participants.
Objective:
This document provides a comprehensive guide aiding research teams in the selection and management of sensors before and during studies of human behavior in the wild. The guide aims to help researchers achieve satisfactory participant compliance and minimize the number of unexpected procedural outcomes.
Methods:
A collection of challenges, consideration criteria, and potential solutions for enabling researchers to select and manage appropriate sensors for their research studies is presented. A general data collection framework suitable for use with modern consumer sensors is explained that enables researchers to address many of the described challenges. Further, a description of the criteria impacting sensor selection, management, and integration that researchers should consider before beginning human behavior studies involving sensors is also provided. Based on a survey conducted in mid-2018, an organized snapshot of consumer-grade human sensing technologies that can be used for human behavior research in natural settings is illustrated.
Results:
The collection of methods are applied in a case study aiming to predict the well-being of nurses and other staff in a hospital. Average daily compliance for sensor usage measured by the presence of data exceeding half the total possible hours each day is about 65% yielding over 355 thousand hours of usable sensor data across 212 participants. Six notable unexpected events occurred during the data collection period all of which had minimal impact on the research project.
Conclusions:
The satisfactory compliance rates and minimal impact of unexpected events during the case study suggest that the challenges, criteria, methods, and mitigation strategies presented as a guide for researchers are helpful for sensor selection and management in longitudinal human behavior studies in the wild.
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.