Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 15, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 17, 2018 - Jan 10, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 23, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of the Smartphone App WhatsApp as an E-Learning Method for Medical Residents: Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial

Clavier T, Ramen J, Dureuil B, Veber B, Hanouz JL, Dupont H, Lebuffe G, Besnier E, Compère V

Use of the Smartphone App WhatsApp as an E-Learning Method for Medical Residents: Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(4):e12825

DOI: 10.2196/12825

PMID: 30964435

PMCID: 6477573

Use of smartphone application WhatsApp® as an e-learning method for residents teaching: a multicenter, controlled, randomized trial

  • Thomas Clavier; 
  • Julie Ramen; 
  • Bertrand Dureuil; 
  • Benoit Veber; 
  • Jean-Luc Hanouz; 
  • Hervé Dupont; 
  • Gilles Lebuffe; 
  • Emmanuel Besnier; 
  • Vincent Compère

ABSTRACT

Background:

The WhatsApp® (WA) smartphone application is the most widely used instant messaging application in the world. Recent studies report the use of WA for educational purposes but there is no prospective study comparing WA's pedagogical effectiveness to any other teaching modality. The goal of this study was to evaluate this cross-platform messaging as a pedagogic tool for the teaching of residents.

Objective:

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of WA on clinical reasoning.

Methods:

Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted among first and second year anesthesiology residents (online recruitment) from four university hospitals in France. Residents were randomized in two groups of online teaching (WA and control). The WA group benefited from daily delivery on the WA application of teaching documents and a weekly clinical case supervised by a senior physician. In the control group, residents had access to the same documents via a traditional computer e-learning platform. Medical reasoning was self-assessed online by script concordance test (SCT; primary parameter) and medical knowledge by multiple choice questions (MCQ). The residents completed an online satisfaction questionnaire.

Results:

In this study, 62 residents were randomized (32 in WA group, 30 in control group), 22 residents in each group answered the online final evaluation. We found a difference between WA and control groups for SCT (60 ± 9 % vs. 68 ± 11 %, respectively; P = .006) but no difference for MCQ (18 ± 4 /30 vs. 16 ± 4 /30, respectively; P = .22). Concerning satisfaction, there was a better global satisfaction rate in the WA group compared to control (9 ± 1 /10 vs. 8 ± 2 /10; P = .049).

Conclusions:

In this study, the use of WA compared to traditional e-learning for resident teaching was associated with worse clinical reasoning despite better global appreciation. The use of WA probably contributes to the dispersion of attention linked to the use of the smartphone. The impact of smartphones on clinical reasoning should be further studied.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Clavier T, Ramen J, Dureuil B, Veber B, Hanouz JL, Dupont H, Lebuffe G, Besnier E, Compère V

Use of the Smartphone App WhatsApp as an E-Learning Method for Medical Residents: Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(4):e12825

DOI: 10.2196/12825

PMID: 30964435

PMCID: 6477573

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.