Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 23, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 25, 2018 - Dec 13, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 31, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Rounds With Video-Consulted Relatives: Qualitative Study on Possibilities and Barriers From the Perspective of Healthcare Providers

Svendsen CO, Vestergaard LV, Dieperink KB, Danbjoerg DB

Patient Rounds With Video-Consulted Relatives: Qualitative Study on Possibilities and Barriers From the Perspective of Healthcare Providers

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e12584

DOI: 10.2196/12584

PMID: 30907746

PMCID: 6452284

The use of video consulted patient rounds with relatives – possibilities and barriers in clinical practice: A qualitative study

  • Christina Oestervang Svendsen; 
  • Lene Vedel Vestergaard; 
  • Karin Brochstedt Dieperink; 
  • Dorthe Boe Danbjoerg

ABSTRACT

Background:

In cancer settings, relatives are often seen as a resource as they are able to support the patient and remember information during hospitalization. However, geographic distance to hospitals, work and family obligations are reasons that may cause difficulties for relatives’ physical participation during hospitalization. This provided inspiration to uncover the possibility of telehealth care in connection with enabling participation by relatives during patient rounds. Telehealth is used advantageously in health care systems but is also at risk of failing during the implementation process because of, for instance, health care professionals’ resistance to change. Research of the implications for healthcare professionals by involving relatives through virtual presence is limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals’ experiences using and implementing technology to involve relatives during video consulted patient rounds.

Methods:

The design was a qualitative approach. Methods used were focus group interviews, short open interviews and field observations of health care professionals working at a cancer department. The text material was analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Results:

Field observational studies were conducted for 15 days, yielding 75 hours of observation. Fourteen sessions of video consulted patient rounds were observed, and 15 pages of field notes written, along with 8 short open interviews with physicians, nurses and staff from management. Moreover, 2 focus group interviews with health care professionals (n=9) were conducted. Health care professionals experienced using the technology as a way to facilitate involvement of the patient’s relatives, without them being physically present. Moreover, it raised questions of whether this way of conducting patient rounds could address the needs of both the patients and the relatives. Time, culture and change of work routines were found to be major barriers when implementing new technology involving relatives.

Conclusions:

This study identifies a double change by introducing both new technology and virtual participation by relatives at the same time. The change had consequences for health care professionals’ work routines with regards to work load, culture and organization because of the complexity in health care systems.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Svendsen CO, Vestergaard LV, Dieperink KB, Danbjoerg DB

Patient Rounds With Video-Consulted Relatives: Qualitative Study on Possibilities and Barriers From the Perspective of Healthcare Providers

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e12584

DOI: 10.2196/12584

PMID: 30907746

PMCID: 6452284

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.