Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2018
Date Accepted: Mar 31, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation

Hauth F, Bizu V, App R, Lautenbacher H, Tenev A, Bitzer M, Malek NP, Zips D, Gani C

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(7):e12345

DOI: 10.2196/12345

PMID: 31342906

PMCID: 6685133

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation

  • Franziska Hauth; 
  • Verena Bizu; 
  • Rehan App; 
  • Heinrich Lautenbacher; 
  • Alina Tenev; 
  • Michael Bitzer; 
  • Nisar Peter Malek; 
  • Daniel Zips; 
  • Cihan Gani

Background:

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to develop and implement a novel Web app (PROMetheus) for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Herein, we have reported our experience with a focus on feasibility, patient acceptance, and a correlation of ePROMs with the clinical course of the patients.

Methods:

In the period between January and June 2018, 21 patients used PROMetheus to score side effects, symptoms, and quality of life–related parameters during and after their treatment. Items of the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were chosen based on the primary site of disease, 27 items for head and neck tumors, 21 items for thoracic tumors, and 24 items for pelvic tumors.

Results:

In total, 17 out of the 21 patients (81%) regularly submitted ePROMs and more than 2500 data points were acquired. An average of 5.2, 3.5, and 3.3 min was required to complete the head and neck, thorax, and pelvis questionnaires, respectively. ePROMS were able to detect the occurrence of both expected and unexpected side effects during the treatment. In addition, a gradual increase in the severity of side effects over the course the treatment and their remission afterward could be observed with ePROMs. In total, 9 out of the 17 patients (53%), mostly those with head and neck and thoracic cancers, reported PRO-CTCAE grade III or IV fatigue with severe impairments of activities of daily life.

Conclusions:

This study shows the successful implementation of an ePROM system and a high patient acceptance. ePROMs have a great potential to improve patient care in radiotherapy by providing a comprehensive documentation of symptoms and side effects, especially of ones that are otherwise underreported.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hauth F, Bizu V, App R, Lautenbacher H, Tenev A, Bitzer M, Malek NP, Zips D, Gani C

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(7):e12345

DOI: 10.2196/12345

PMID: 31342906

PMCID: 6685133

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.