Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Sep 20, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 25, 2018 - Oct 9, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 9, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Determining Best Practices for Management of Bacteriuria in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study

Skelton F, Martin LA, Evans CT, Kramer J, Grigoryan L, Richardson P, Kunik ME, Poon IO, Holmes SA, Trautner BW

Determining Best Practices for Management of Bacteriuria in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(2):e12272

DOI: 10.2196/12272

PMID: 30762584

PMCID: 6393777

Mixed Methods Protocol to Determine Best Practices for Management of Bacteriuria in Spinal Cord Injury

  • Felicia Skelton; 
  • Lindsey Ann Martin; 
  • Charlesnika T. Evans; 
  • Jennifer Kramer; 
  • Larissa Grigoryan; 
  • Pete Richardson; 
  • Mark E. Kunik; 
  • Ivy Oiyee Poon; 
  • S. Ann Holmes; 
  • Barbara W. Trautner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Bacteriuria, either asymptomatic (ASB) or symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Current Veterans Health Administration (VHA) guidelines recommend a screening urinalysis and urine culture for every Veteran with SCI during annual evaluation, even when asymptomatic, which is contrary to other national guidelines. Our preliminary data suggest that a positive urine culture (even without signs or symptoms of infection) drives antibiotic use. Through a series of innovative studies utilizing mixed methods, administrative databases, and focus groups, we will gain further knowledge about the attitudes driving current urine testing practices during the annual exam, as well as quantitative data on the clinical outcomes of these practices.

Methods:

Aim 1 will identify patient, provider, and facility factors driving bacteriuria testing and subsequent antibiotic use after the SCI annual evaluation through qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys. Aim 2 will use national VHA databases to identify the predictors of urine testing and subsequent antibiotic use during the annual examination, and compare the clinical outcomes of those who received antibiotics to those who did not. Aim 3 will use the information gathered from the previous two aims to develop the “Test Smart, Treat Smart” intervention, a combination of patient and provider education and resources that will help stakeholders have informed conversations about urine testing and antibiotic use; feasibility will be tested at a single site. Discussion: The negative consequences of antibiotic overuse and antibiotic resistance are well documented, and have national and even global implications. This study will develop an intervention aimed to educate stakeholders on evidence-based management of ASB and UTI, and guide antibiotic stewardship in this high-risk population. The next step will be to refine the intervention and test its feasibility and effectiveness at multiple sites, as well as reform policy for management of this common, but burdensome condition.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Skelton F, Martin LA, Evans CT, Kramer J, Grigoryan L, Richardson P, Kunik ME, Poon IO, Holmes SA, Trautner BW

Determining Best Practices for Management of Bacteriuria in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(2):e12272

DOI: 10.2196/12272

PMID: 30762584

PMCID: 6393777

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.