Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 14, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 19, 2018 - Oct 27, 2018
Date Accepted: Jan 7, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Argument Against Cross-Platform Development: Lessons From an Augmented Reality App Prototype for Rural Emergency Responders

Weichelt B, Heimonen T, Pilz M, Yoder A, Bendixsen C

An Argument Against Cross-Platform Development: Lessons From an Augmented Reality App Prototype for Rural Emergency Responders

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(3):e12207

DOI: 10.2196/12207

PMID: 30920380

PMCID: 6458533

An Argument against Cross-Platform Development: Lessons from an Augmented Reality App Prototype for Rural Emergency Responders

  • Bryan Weichelt; 
  • Tomi Heimonen; 
  • Matthew Pilz; 
  • Aaron Yoder; 
  • Casper Bendixsen

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications offer support for emergency responders in rural areas. We describe the lessons learned from the development process of AR MAPPER, a MAR app that provides emergency responders onsite information about the agricultural operation they enter.

Methods:

Cross-platform frameworks were used to create AR MAPPER to accommodate budget constraints and overcome issues with markerless MAR technologies. While the single codebase and web technologies streamlined development, cross-device hardware limitations impacted location accuracy, lengthened the development cycle, and required regular updates to third-party libraries. Lessons learned: Developers should consider single platform native development to benefit from platform-specific MAR implementations and to avoid development and testing costs associated with cross-platform implementation. Emergency response organizations may be more likely to utilize a single platform across their devices, reducing the benefit of cross-platform development. Furthermore, providing map-based, non-AR cross-platform applications for landowners, farmers, and ranchers would help improve and maintain data quality.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Weichelt B, Heimonen T, Pilz M, Yoder A, Bendixsen C

An Argument Against Cross-Platform Development: Lessons From an Augmented Reality App Prototype for Rural Emergency Responders

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(3):e12207

DOI: 10.2196/12207

PMID: 30920380

PMCID: 6458533

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.