Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2018
Date Accepted: Feb 10, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress (CEDD): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Chima CC, Salemi JL, Sidani MA, Zoorob RJ

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress (CEDD): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e12166

DOI: 10.2196/12166

PMID: 30938687

PMCID: 6465980

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress (CEDD): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Charles C Chima; 
  • Jason L Salemi; 
  • Mohamad A Sidani; 
  • Roger J Zoorob

Background:

Diabetes distress (DD), a type of psychological distress specific to people with diabetes, is strongly associated with difficulties in performing self-care and inability to meet glycemic targets. Despite increased recognition of the need to manage DD, interventions that are both feasible and effective for reducing DD in routine care settings are not yet known. A pilot study showed that health coaching (HC) has some efficacy in addressing DD, but no adequately powered study has implemented a pragmatic research design capable of assessing the real-world effectiveness of HC in reducing DD.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to describe the rationale and design of an ongoing clinical trial, Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress trial, that seeks to assess whether HC effectively reduces DD among primary care patients with diabetes and whether HC is more effective than an educational program targeting DD.

Methods:

The 2-arm randomized controlled trial is taking place at an academic family medicine practice in Houston, Texas. Both arms will receive usual care, which includes education about DD. In addition, the intervention arm will receive 8 HC sessions over a 5-month period. The primary outcome measure is reduction in DD over a 6-month period. Additional outcome measures include changes in hemoglobin A1c and self-care practices (medication-taking, dietary, and physical activity behaviors).

Results:

As of March 2019, screening and recruitment are ongoing, and the results are expected by July 2020.

Conclusions:

HC is feasible in primary care and has been successfully applied to improving chronic disease self-management and outcomes. This study will provide evidence as to whether it has significant value in addressing important unmet psychological and behavioral needs of patients with diabetes.

ClinicalTrial:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03617146; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03617146 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76Va37dbO)

International Registered Report:

DERR1-10.2196/12166


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chima CC, Salemi JL, Sidani MA, Zoorob RJ

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress (CEDD): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e12166

DOI: 10.2196/12166

PMID: 30938687

PMCID: 6465980

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.