Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 3, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 9, 2018 - Nov 4, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using Crowdsourcing to Develop a Peer-Led Intervention for Safer Dating App Use: Pilot Study

Wong WCW, Song L, See C, Lau STH, Sun WH, Choi KWY, Tucker J

Using Crowdsourcing to Develop a Peer-Led Intervention for Safer Dating App Use: Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(4):e12098

DOI: 10.2196/12098

PMID: 32314975

PMCID: 7201323

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Using Crowdsourcing to Develop a Peer-Led Intervention for Safer Dating App Use: Pilot Study

  • William Chi Wai Wong; 
  • Lin Song; 
  • Christopher See; 
  • Stephanie Tze Hei Lau; 
  • Wai Han Sun; 
  • Kitty Wai Ying Choi; 
  • Joseph Tucker

Background:

Smartphone-based dating apps are rapidly transforming how people seek potential sexual and romantic partners. However, they can also increase the risk of unsafe sexual behaviors, harassment, and infringement of personal privacy. Current research on interventions for safer dating app use remains insufficient.

Objective:

The goal of this study was to describe the development of an intervention for safer dating app usage using crowdsourcing and peer-led approaches.

Methods:

This paper describes the development of an intervention program designed to promote safer dating app use among college students. Crowdsourcing and peer-led approaches were adopted during key stages of the development process. Focus group discussions were held to assess the experience and needs of dating app users. A crowdsourcing contest then solicited ideas for performance objectives for the intervention. These objectives were grouped to further identify practical strategies. A one-day intensive workshop was subsequently held with peer mentors to brainstorm ideas for the production of creative interventional materials. The intervention programs were produced and tested in a pilot study. The app’s effectiveness will be evaluated in a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Results:

The intervention program consists of a risk assessment tool, a first-person scenario game, and four short videos. The risk assessment tool, comprised of 14 questions, will give the participant a score to determine their level of risk of adverse events when using dating apps. The scenario game is a first-person simulation game where the players are presented with choices when faced with different scenarios. The short videos each last 2-4 minutes, with points of discussion aimed at addressing the risks of using dating apps. The programs were piloted and were found to be relatable and helpful when further modifications were made.

Conclusions:

Potential challenges identified during the development process included data management and analysis, sustaining peer mentors’ interests and participation, and balancing between providing more information and perpetuating social stigma around dating app use. By integrating new approaches, such as crowdsourcing and the peer-led approach, in developing an intervention for safer dating app use, our development process provides a viable model for developing future interventions to address the risks associated with dating app use.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wong WCW, Song L, See C, Lau STH, Sun WH, Choi KWY, Tucker J

Using Crowdsourcing to Develop a Peer-Led Intervention for Safer Dating App Use: Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(4):e12098

DOI: 10.2196/12098

PMID: 32314975

PMCID: 7201323

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.