Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Aug 30, 2018
Date Accepted: Jun 28, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Interventions to Support Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Systematic Review

McCann L, McMillan KA, Pugh G

Digital Interventions to Support Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Systematic Review

JMIR Cancer 2019;5(2):e12071

DOI: 10.2196/12071

PMID: 31368438

PMCID: 6693302

Systematic Review of Digital Health Interventions to Support Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

  • Lisa McCann; 
  • Kathryn Anne McMillan; 
  • Gemma Pugh

ABSTRACT

Background:

The last decade has seen an increase in the number of digital health interventions designed to support adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer

Objective:

The objective of this review was to identify, characterize and fully assess the quality, feasibility and efficacy of existing digital health interventions developed specifically for AYAs aged between 13 and 39 years living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis.

Methods:

Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and PsychMed to identify digital health interventions designed specifically for AYA living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis. Data on the characteristics and outcomes of each intervention were synthesized.

Results:

A total of 4731 intervention studies were identified via the searches; 38 interventions (43 study articles) met the inclusion criteria. Most (n=20) were website-based interventions. The majority of studies focused on symptom management (n=12), self-care (n=9) or (n=7) emotional health. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the range of study designs and outcomes assessed. The majority of digital health interventions included multiple automated and communicative functions such as enriched information environment, automated follow-up messages and access to peer support. Where reported (n=20 studies) AYAs subjective experience of using the digital platform was typically positive. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good (mean QualSyst scores >68%). Some studies reported feasibility outcomes (uptake, acceptability, attrition) but were not sufficiently powered to comment on intervention effects.

Conclusions:

Numerous digital health interventions have been developed and designed to support young people living with and beyond a diagnosis of cancer. However, many of these interventions have yet to be deployed, implemented and evaluated at scale.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McCann L, McMillan KA, Pugh G

Digital Interventions to Support Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Systematic Review

JMIR Cancer 2019;5(2):e12071

DOI: 10.2196/12071

PMID: 31368438

PMCID: 6693302

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.