Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Sep 3, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 6, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Daboval T, Ward N, Schoenherr JR, Moore GP, Carew C, Lambrinakos-Raymond A, Ferretti E

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(5):e12039

DOI: 10.2196/12039

PMID: 31066707

PMCID: 6530261

Testing the Assessment Communication Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: A validation study

  • Thierry Daboval; 
  • Natalie Ward; 
  • Jordan R Schoenherr; 
  • Gregory P Moore; 
  • Caitlin Carew; 
  • Alicia Lambrinakos-Raymond; 
  • Emanuela Ferretti

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although well-designed tools to assess communication during medical interviews and complex encounters exist, valid assessment tools to assess communication during ethically sensitive situations that includes domains such as moral judgment and management of ethical conflicts are needed. In this context, we created an assessment tool that includes key competencies associated with practice in ethically challenging situations that are grouped into three distinct categories: communication, civility and respect, clinical and ethical judgment and decision-making.

Objective:

The objective of this project is to pilot-test an assessment tool that balances the demands of clinical decision-making while addressing sensitive ethical features of these scenarios that respects patients and family members. We describe the logic of the Assessment Communication Tool for Ethics (ACT4Ethics) and the study method that we will use to obtain validity evidence to support the scale construction.

Methods:

We will follow a multi-phase project designed according to modern validity principles including content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences. The design considers threats to validity such as construct underrepresentation and factors exerting nonrandom influence on scores. The project includes two parts: 1) train the raters in the use of the tool, and 2), a simulation pilot Scenario Oriented Learning in Ethics (SOLE) workshop.

Results:

A total of 60 independent assessments from 10 trained raters will be obtained for analysis. A comparison of raters’ performance will allow us to compute a measure of interrater reliability. Participants will provide feedback on a standard form. This project will take 18 months to complete and the results should be made available by December 2019.

Conclusions:

The ACT4Ethics will allow clinician teachers to assess and monitor competency levels of trainees’ communication skills when navigating ethically sensitive clinical situations. It will also guide them in providing meaningful feedback to the trainees more likely to impact trainees’ learning of appropriate communication skills.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Daboval T, Ward N, Schoenherr JR, Moore GP, Carew C, Lambrinakos-Raymond A, Ferretti E

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(5):e12039

DOI: 10.2196/12039

PMID: 31066707

PMCID: 6530261

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.