Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Aug 8, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 9, 2018 - Aug 23, 2018
Date Accepted: Jan 25, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey

Jang M, Vorderstrasse A

Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e11865

DOI: 10.2196/11865

PMID: 30969173

PMCID: 6479282

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey

  • Myoungock Jang; 
  • Allison Vorderstrasse

Background:

Web-based survey data collection has been widely used because of its advantages, although attaining and retaining participants can be challenging. There are several factors associated with successful Web-based survey participation; yet little is known regarding racial or ethnic and socioeconomic differences in the progress of a Web-based survey.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine racial or ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) differences in participation in a Web-based survey.

Methods:

We conducted a secondary data analysis of a study dataset containing information on parents of preschool children. We used 2 phases of Web-based surveys: (1) screening questions including race or ethnicity information and (2) full survey with a consent form. Once potential participants submitted the screening questions, including their racial or ethnic information, the team sent the full survey link to potential participants who met study eligibility criteria. We calculated the proportion of racial or ethnic groups in each of the following areas: consent, partial survey completion, and total survey completion.

Results:

A total of 487 participants (236 non-Hispanic white, 44 Hispanic, 137 black, and 70 Asian) completed initial screening questions, and a total of 458 participants met study eligibility criteria. Compared with black participants, non-Hispanic white and Asian participants were more likely to consent to participate in the study (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, 95% CI 1.08-2.78, P=.02; OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.04-4.13, P=.04, respectively). There was no racial or ethnic difference with respect to the completion of demographic questions or completion of a partial survey. Finally, compared with black participants, non-Hispanic white participants were more likely to complete the entire survey (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.51-7.06, P<.001). With respect to SES, less educated non-Hispanic white participants were less likely to complete the survey compared with their counterparts with more education (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.50-1.48, P<.001).

Conclusions:

We found a significant difference among racial or ethnic groups as well as different education levels in Web-based survey participation. Survey researchers need to consider the SES and racial or ethnic differences in Web-based survey participation and develop strategies to address this bias in participation and completion in their research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jang M, Vorderstrasse A

Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e11865

DOI: 10.2196/11865

PMID: 30969173

PMCID: 6479282

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.