Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 19, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 23, 2018 - Sep 17, 2018
Date Accepted: Jan 23, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study

Portz JD, Bayliss EA, Bull S, Boxer R, Bekelman D, Gleason K, Czaja S

Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(4):e11604

DOI: 10.2196/11604

PMID: 30958272

PMCID: 6475817

Intent to Use and Use-Experience of a Patient Portal among Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study

  • Jennifer Dickman Portz; 
  • Elizabeth A. Bayliss; 
  • Sheana Bull; 
  • Rebecca Boxer; 
  • David Bekelman; 
  • Kathy Gleason; 
  • Sara Czaja

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient portals offer modern digital tools for older adults to engage with their health care system. However, little is also known about portal utilization patterns, satisfaction, or perceived benefits of use among older users.

Objective:

To qualitatively explore older adults’ intent to use and use-experience of a patient portal to develop user-friendly systems.

Methods:

Using Kaiser Permanente Colorado’s (KPCO) established patient portal, My Health Manager, 24 older patients (78.41±5.4 years) with multiple chronic conditions participated in a focus group. Stratified-random sampling was used to maximize age and user experience of the sample. The semi-structured focus groups used a combination of discussion and think-aloud strategies. Two coders lead the theoretically-driven analysis based on the Technology Acceptance Model to determine themes related to use behavior, portal usefulness and ease of use.

Results:

Portal users commonly used email, pharmacy, and lab results sections of the portal. While generally the portal was seen to be easy to use, simple, and quick, challenges related to log-ins, design (color, font), and specific features were identified. Such challenges inhibited participants intent to use the portal entirely or specific features. Participants indicated that the portal improved patient-provider communication, saved time and money, and provided relevant health information. Participants intended to use features that were beneficial to their health management and easy to use.

Conclusions:

Older adults are interested in using patient portals and are already taking advantage of features available to them. We have the opportunity to better engage older adults to use portals but need to pay close attention to key considerations promoting usefulness and ease of use. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Portz JD, Bayliss EA, Bull S, Boxer R, Bekelman D, Gleason K, Czaja S

Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(4):e11604

DOI: 10.2196/11604

PMID: 30958272

PMCID: 6475817

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.