Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jul 17, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 21, 2018 - Sep 15, 2018
Date Accepted: Mar 24, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Understanding of and Barriers to Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Access in a Culturally Diverse Pediatric Population

Miklin DJ, Vangara SS, Delamater AM, Goodman KW

Understanding of and Barriers to Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Access in a Culturally Diverse Pediatric Population

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(2):e11570

DOI: 10.2196/11570

PMID: 31066681

PMCID: 6526688

Understanding of and Barriers to Electronic Health Records in a Culturally Diverse Pediatric Population

  • Daniel Jonathan Miklin; 
  • Sameera Sree Vangara; 
  • Alan Mark Delamater; 
  • Kenneth Wayne Goodman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health records (EHR) have become standard in the healthcare setting. In an effort to improve health literacy, foster patient- provider communication, and ease the transition from adolescent to adult care, our institution created a policy that allows patients aged 13-17 to have EHR access. Literature review revealed predictable differences in portal registration between different ethnicities and socioeconomic statuses. Consequently a cross-sectional survey was developed to investigate barriers to EHR access in a sample of culturally diverse adolescents.

Objective:

Assess for barriers to EHR access in a culturally diverse adolescent population.

Methods:

A 42-item anonymous survey was completed by 97 adolescents age 13-18 attending general pediatrics clinics. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests.

Results:

Average participant age was 15.5 + 1.5 years with 59.8% male and 40.2% female. Participants were 44.3% Black, 41.2% Hispanic, 9.3% Caucasian, 3.1% Asian, and 2.1% other. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions of confidentiality in age (13-15 vs. 16-18; P=0.001) and insurance status (government vs. private, P=0.012), but not gender, ethnicity or parental education level. Older, privately insured girls had more confidence in the confidentiality of their relationship with their doctors. 93.8% of participants had heard the term "EHR," but only 54.6% were familiar with its function. 77.3% of patients primarily accessed the internet through phones and 50% of participants knew that patients under 18 could obtain care for mental health, substance abuse, sexual health and pregnancy.

Conclusions:

Research has identified gaps in EHR technology with regards to the pediatric patient population. Results of our survey show adolescents may have misconceptions regarding the doctor-patient relationship, their ability to obtain care, and the modalities present in an Electronic Health Record. As technology progresses, it is essential to have a deeper understanding of adolescents' perceptions of confidentiality, technology, and available resources in order to design an EHR system that encourages patient education and communication while limiting barriers to care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miklin DJ, Vangara SS, Delamater AM, Goodman KW

Understanding of and Barriers to Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Access in a Culturally Diverse Pediatric Population

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(2):e11570

DOI: 10.2196/11570

PMID: 31066681

PMCID: 6526688

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.