Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 29, 2026 - Dec 24, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Healthcare Stakeholder Transformation Mapping by 2036: A Qualitative Foresight Study

  • Nora Arvai; 
  • Gellert Katonai; 
  • Bertalan Meskó

ABSTRACT

Background:

Healthcare transformation is reshaping stakeholders’ roles, relationships, responsibilities, and influence. Current stakeholder mapping approaches focus mainly on existing configurations, offering limited insight into how they may evolve. A foresight perspective could help address this gap.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine how the healthcare stakeholder ecosystem might evolve by 2036 and develop a Stakeholder Transformation Map showing anticipated changes in stakeholder roles, relationships, influence, decision-making authority, and responsibilities, along with emerging functions.

Methods:

An international qualitative foresight study was conducted from June to September 2026 with 30 experts across 16 countries, recruited through purposive and complementary snowball sampling. An 11-item online questionnaire included both structured-response and open-ended questions. We analyzed structured responses descriptively and examined qualitative data using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were then integrated through a foresight-oriented synthesis.

Results:

We identified four themes comprising 12 subthemes: redistribution of healthcare work and expertise; increasing patient agency without equivalent decision-making power; growing integration of technology actors; and the distribution of influence, authority, control, and accountability. Although 29/30 participants (96.7%) identified potential emerging stakeholders, 23/30 (76.7%) selected changes in roles or responsibilities as the most significant dimension of transformation. The findings suggested that new stakeholders may emerge alongside the reconfiguration of established functions, while future relationships and decision-making arrangements remain uncertain.

Conclusions:

Healthcare stakeholder transformation may involve both the reshaping of established roles and the emergence of new actors who challenge existing boundaries. The Stakeholder Transformation Map provides a foresight-oriented approach to exploring continuity, transformation, potential discontinuity, and uncertainty, moving stakeholder analysis beyond static representations to consider interconnected possibilities for 2036. Clinical Trial: -


 Citation

Please cite as:

Arvai N, Katonai G, Meskó B

Healthcare Stakeholder Transformation Mapping by 2036: A Qualitative Foresight Study

JMIR Preprints. 28/10/2026:115604

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.115604

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/115604

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.