Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Oct 27, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 27, 2026 - Dec 22, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Explainable Interface Design for Human–AI Collaboration in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Mixed Methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) enables real-time, in vivo tissue assessment during head and neck cancer surgery, where the balance between oncological safety and functional preservation is particularly delicate. Artificial intelligence (AI) can support CLE interpretation, yet clinical adoption remains limited, a gap attributed less to model performance than to a lack of interfaces that make AI outputs interpretable and trustworthy at the point of care.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate how explanatory, user-centered interfaces can enable reliable human–AI collaboration for AI-assisted CLE across the surgical workflow.
Methods:
Following a user-centered design approach, a user journey map informed the development of three high-fidelity prototypes addressing intraoperative, pre-/postoperative, and educational use cases. A mixed-methods evaluation with five experienced surgeons from four institutions combined think-aloud exploration, the short User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S), and semi-structured interviews; qualitative data were analysed inductively through thematic analysis.
Results:
Explainability, conveyed through influential morphological features, class activation maps, and example-based case comparisons, anchored AI recommendations in surgeons’ established clinical reasoning and supported verification against their own judgement. Explicit communication of model uncertainty emerged as a distinct prerequisite for calibrated trust. Clarity, simplicity, and adaptive information density were identified as central design principles, while diverging preferences pointed to a need for configurable interaction modes. All three prototypes were rated as excellent on the UEQ-S (overall means 2.53–2.68).
Conclusions:
Trustworthy integration of AI into CLE depends primarily on explanatory interfaces aligned with clinical reasoning and on transparent communication of uncertainty, rather than on model performance alone. Configurable, workflow-adaptive designs and case-based educational applications represent promising directions for clinical translation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.