Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 13, 2018 - Jul 27, 2018
Date Accepted: Oct 15, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study

Lecomte F, VIGNION AS, VICENTINI C, THECUA E, DELEPORTE P, DUHAMEL A, MORDON S, MORTIER L

Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e11530

DOI: 10.2196/11530

PMID: 31025952

PMCID: 6658309

A phase II study evaluating the non-inferiority of a photodynamic therapy protocol involving the Flexitheralight device compared to the conventional protocol. (FLEXITHERALIGHT Study)

  • Fabienne Lecomte; 
  • Anne Sophie VIGNION; 
  • Claire VICENTINI; 
  • ELISE THECUA; 
  • Pascal DELEPORTE; 
  • ALAIN DUHAMEL; 
  • SERGE MORDON; 
  • LAURENT MORTIER

ABSTRACT

Background:

Actinic Keratosis (AK) are common pre-invasive cancerous lesions in sun-exposed skin, which negatively affect the quality of life in patients and may progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Studies have shown that if untreated, AK may regress, or alternatively, may progress to SCC, with significant morbidity and possible lethal outcome. The most commonly used treatments for AK are cryotherapy, topical chemotherapy and, more recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT). This clinical study is part of a project, which aims at the creation of specific light emitting fabrics (LEF) in order to strongly improve the efficiency and reliability of PDT

Objective:

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of a new PDT protocol involving the device Flexitheralight (N-PDT) versus the classical protocol involving the device Aktilite®128 (Galderma) (C-PDT) for the treatment of AK. All participants receive both protocols. The primary objective is to compare the lesion response rate at 3 months of N-PDT versus C-PDT. Secondary objectives are the evaluation of the pain and local tolerance during treatment, the clinical evolution of the subject's skin aspect, the quality of life and satisfaction of patients.

Methods:

The study is a split-face intra-individual comparison of two PDT protocols. The number of patients to be recruited is 42. Patients are exposed to a continuous red light spectrum with Aktilite®128 on one face, and, to a fractionated illumination with the new device Flexitheralight on the other face. Males or females over the age of 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of at least 10 previously untreated, non-pigmented, non-hyperkeratotic AK of Grade I and II of the forehead and/or scalp (according to Olsen et Al. JAAD 1991) are included in the department of dermatology of the Lille University Hospital. The patients come to the investigational center for one treatment session (Day 1) and they are followed at Day 7, Month 3 and Month 6. A second session of treatment can be performed at Day 111 in case of incomplete response at Month 3. Data are analysed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean and standard deviation and categorical variables are expressed as the frequency and percentage. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to assess the normality of the distribution.

Results:

Investigations are achieved but data analysis is ongoing. The statistical results will be analyzed by the end of 2018

Conclusions:

In case of non-inferior efficiency and better tolerability than C-PDT, N-PDT could become the treatment of choice for AK. Moreover, N-PDT is easy to implement in hospitals. Clinical Trial: N° ID-RCB 2013-A01096-39 Number Clinical Trial (NCT) NCT03076918 Protocol version 2.0 date 23.02.2015


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lecomte F, VIGNION AS, VICENTINI C, THECUA E, DELEPORTE P, DUHAMEL A, MORDON S, MORTIER L

Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2019;8(4):e11530

DOI: 10.2196/11530

PMID: 31025952

PMCID: 6658309

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.