Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 3, 2026 - Dec 29, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Comparative Efficacy of Virtual Reality and Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation (Either Alone or Combined) on Upper Limb Motor Function and Daily Living Ability in Post-Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Over the past decade, with the rapid advancement of technology and artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR) and robot-assisted training (RAT) have been gradually applied to stroke patients’ rehabilitation, either used alone or in combination with each other. They have shown great promise in improving upper limb motor function and activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients.
Objective:
his systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aim to evaluate the efficacy of VR, RAT (either alone or in combination) for upper limb rehabilitation and daily function in stroke patients.
Methods:
This study was conducted in strict compliance with PRISMA principles and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251029030). PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE,Scoups, ProQuest Dissertations, the Cochrane Library and grey literature from ClinicalTrials.gov. were searched from the time of each database was constructed until September 13, 2026, and the references of the included literature were consulted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias. A network meta-analysis was conducted employing Bayesian methods. Data analysis was executed with R version 4.2.1 and Stata version 17.0.
Results:
A total of thirty-nine studies involving 1646 patients were included. In terms of improving Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve [SUCRA]: 44.6%, Mean Difference [MD]: 4.10, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI ]:0.70 to 7.45) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (SUCRA: 47%, MD:3.61, 95% CI:-2.64 to 9.71 ), robot-assisted training combined with virtual reality for unilateral upper limb patients (RAT+ VR [unilateral]) was the most likely to be the best intervention; RAT had the highest likelihood of being the best intervention in terms of improving Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) (SUCRA: 60.5%, MD:4.25, 95% CI:-2.33 to 12.74) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores (SUCRA: 50%, MD:7.53, 95% CI:-7.03 to 21.99).
Conclusions:
RAT+VR (unilateral) may be the most effective intervention for improving FMA-UE and FIM scores. RAT may be more effective in improving WMFT and MBI scores.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.