Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (no longer under consideration since Nov 16, 2021)

Date Submitted: Jun 28, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 3, 2018 - Aug 28, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluation of a mobile phone-based intervention with photographs to improve healthy food choices

  • Aitor Sánchez; 
  • Herminia López García de la Serrana; 
  • María Jesús Oliveras López

Background:

Mobile phone-based interventions have demonstrated positive effects on body compositionand food habits. They are cheap, easy to implement and could play an important role in fighting health problems. However, their potential as tools for monitoring or dietary treatment has yet to be examined. As far as we know, no specific application has been designed to keep health specialists and patients in touch, providing fluid communication between them to record, monitor and evaluate dietary behaviour via photographs.

Objective:

To describe the experiences of users of a mobile-phone app designed to provide monitoring and deliver feedback with healthy choices. To identify factors facilitating usage of a phone-based intervention with photographs.

Methods:

We carried out an experiment via an instant message application over 5 working days. 20 young adult Spanish volunteers were enrolled to upload and send all their food choices to a dietitian via a mobile instant messaging application. They were asked to send information on all intakes other than water to their dietitian during the trial. The dietitian responded with a numerical evaluation of how healthy the volunteers’ choice was on a scale of 0 to 5, including an attached photo as a healthier alternative. We provided participants with an online survey using a Likert scale in order to collect information on their experience during the trial

Results:

A total of 368 intakes were evaluated and 368 different intakes were suggested as alternatives The most noteworthy questions mentioned by the participants are the motivational aspect of the experience, or the usefulness of alternative suggestions for meals. Other advantages for the participants were the awareness of what they eat and being able to control their food better. 82,4% of the sample state they were influenced to eat more healthy food. 95% were “motivated to eat better during the experiment”. Furthermore, 58,8% acknowledged their diet was better during the trial than their normal routine.

Conclusions:

The participants stated that the experiment made them change their routines, eat a more healthy diet and feel motivated. Unfortunately, we did not collect pre-intervention or long-term dietary records. An application using food choice photographs could be a valuable tool to motivate people to enhance their food habits with the direct assistance of dietitian.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sánchez A, López García de la Serrana H, Oliveras López MJ

Evaluation of a mobile phone-based intervention with photographs to improve healthy food choices

JMIR Preprints. 28/06/2018:11426

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.11426

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11426

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.