Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Oct 6, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 21, 2026 - Dec 16, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Administration of Vasopressors during Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation was not associated with Early Graft Dysfunction: A Pilot Study

  • Kevin Eappen; 
  • Xiangyu Zhao; 
  • Daithi Heffernan; 
  • Paul Morrissey; 
  • Shyamal Asher

ABSTRACT

Background:

Intraoperative hemodynamic support during deceased donor renal transplants (DDRTs) frequently involves vasopressors and crystalloid administration; however, theoretical concerns persist that vasopressors may contribute to adverse outcomes by reducing renal perfusion through vasoconstriction, while excessive fluid administration may contribute to renal congestion and impaired microcirculatory flow. Few studies investigate the impact of intraoperative vasopressor exposure on graft outcomes.

Objective:

In this pilot study, we assessed the relationship between intraoperative vasopressor use and early graft function in a single-center cohort of DDRTs.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults (≥18 years) DDRT recipients at a single institution between 2020 and 2022. Demographic variables, donor and graft characteristics, intraoperative vasopressor exposure, and postoperative outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record under institutional review board approval. Primary endpoints included DGF, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 90 days, and graft failure at 1 year. Multivariable regression models were constructed adjusting for donor age, recipient age, and sex, as well as vasopressor exposure variables.

Results:

Ninety DDRT procedures were included (mean recipient age 52.1 years; mean donor age 42.1 years; 57 male recipients). Intraoperative vasopressors were administered in 82 cases. Phenylephrine was most used (n=75), including both infusion (n=68, mean total dose 4,906 mcg, rate range 10-100mcg/min) and bolus administration (n=57; mean 345 mcg). Additional agents included ephedrine (n=15), norepinephrine infusion (n=4), and vasopressin (n=3). Vasopressors were administered after graft reperfusion in 70 patients. Mean intraoperative crystalloid administration was 2.5L per patient. DGF occurred in 26 patients. Mean 90-day eGFR was 62.2 mL/min/1.73m². Graft failure occurred in 6 patients at 12 months. After adjustment, vasopressor exposure was not significantly associated with 90-day eGFR or DGF across multiple exposure definitions.

Conclusions:

Intraoperative vasopressor use was not associated with adverse short-term graft outcomes, including delayed graft function and 90-day EGFR. These findings support that clinically indicated vasopressor use during DDRT does not adversely affect renal function postoperatively. Though limited by small sample size, this supports the use of intraoperative vasopressors during DDRT.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Eappen K, Zhao X, Heffernan D, Morrissey P, Asher S

Administration of Vasopressors during Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation was not associated with Early Graft Dysfunction: A Pilot Study

JMIR Preprints. 06/10/2026:113776

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.113776

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/113776

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.