Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 1, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 3, 2018 - Jul 29, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 10, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation

Bennetts SK, Hokke S, Crawford S, Hackworth NJ, Leach L, Nguyen C, Nicholson JM, Cooklin AR

Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e11206

DOI: 10.2196/11206

PMID: 30839282

PMCID: 6425313

Using paid and free Facebook methods to recruit Australian parents to an online work-family survey: An evaluation

  • Shannon K Bennetts; 
  • Stacey Hokke; 
  • Sharinne Crawford; 
  • Naomi J Hackworth; 
  • Liana Leach; 
  • Cattram Nguyen; 
  • Jan M Nicholson; 
  • Amanda R Cooklin

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence of social media makes it a viable alternative to ‘traditional’ offline methods of recruiting and engaging participants in health research. Despite burgeoning use and interest, few studies have rigorously evaluated its effectiveness and feasibility in terms of recruitment costs, retention rates, and sample representativeness.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using Facebook to recruit employed Australian parents to an online survey about managing work and family demands, specifically to examine: (i) the cost-effectiveness of Facebook recruitment; (ii) the retention rate and demographic characteristics of parents who returned to complete a follow-up survey 6 weeks later; and (iii) the representativeness of the sample, compared to a population-based cohort of parents.

Methods:

Recruitment was conducted using 20 paid Facebook advertising campaigns, together with free advertising in the form of posts on relevant Facebook pages.

Results:

Recruitment strategies together resulted in 6,653 ‘clicks’ on the survey, from which 5,378 parents consented to participate, with a full-survey completion rate of 86.7% (n = 4,665). Of those who completed the survey, 85.8% (n = 4,009) agreed to be re-contacted, with 57.8% (n = 2,317/4,009) completing the follow-up survey (i.e. 43.1% (n = 2,317/5,378) of parents who consented to the initial survey). Paid Facebook advertising recruited nearly 75% of the sample at AU$2.32 per completed survey (AU$7,969 spent, 3,440 surveys completed). Compared to a population-based sample, participants at baseline were more likely to be university educated (p<.001), experience greater work-family conflict (p<.001) and psychological distress (p<.001), and were less likely to be born outside Australia (p<.001) or live in a disadvantaged neighbourhood (p<.001).

Conclusions:

Facebook provided a feasible, rapid method to recruit a large national sample of parents for health research. However, some sample biases were observed and should be considered when recruiting participants via Facebook. Retention of participants at 6-8 week follow-up was less than half the initial sample; this may reflect limited ongoing participant engagement for those recruited through social media, compared to face-to-face. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bennetts SK, Hokke S, Crawford S, Hackworth NJ, Leach L, Nguyen C, Nicholson JM, Cooklin AR

Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e11206

DOI: 10.2196/11206

PMID: 30839282

PMCID: 6425313

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.