Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 18, 2026 - Nov 13, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Assessing Discharge Readiness in the Intensive Care Unit: Development and Internal Validation of the ICU Discharge Readiness Score (iDRS) Using MIMIC-IV
ABSTRACT
Background:
ICU discharge decisions rely largely on subjective clinician judgment and on severity scores such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), which were designed to quantify organ dysfunction rather than to assess discharge readiness. No validated tool systematically evaluates discharge readiness from the physiological parameters routinely monitored at the ICU bedside.
Objective:
We developed and internally validated the ICU Discharge Readiness Score (iDRS), a two-tier screening tool for ICU discharge readiness using bedside physiological parameters and minimal laboratory data.
Methods:
Using the MIMIC-IV v3.1 database (2008–2022), we constructed daily 08:00 assessment grids for 76,801 ICU stays, generating 266,070 assessment points. iDRS employs a two-tier structure: Tier 1 automatically assigns a score of zero to patients receiving active life-sustaining treatments; Tier 2 scores the remaining patients across four physiological domains (respiratory, hemodynamic, neurological, renal/perfusion) on a 0–8 scale. Discriminative performance was evaluated using AUROC, compared against the SOFA score via the Paired patient-level cluster bootstrap, and supplemented by decision curve analysis and discordant case characterization. Temporal validation across early (2008-2016) and recent (2017-2022) cohorts was performed.
Results:
iDRS achieved an AUROC of 0.750 (95% CI 0.747–0.753), significantly outperforming SOFA (0.650; P<.001). At the optimal cutoff of ≥5, sensitivity was 0.895 and NPV was 0.949. Decision curve analysis demonstrated superior net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Discordant case analysis revealed that discharge failure was associated with chronic comorbidity burden (Charlson index r = −0.169) and hospitalization complexity (hospital LOS r = −0.367) rather than acute organ dysfunction. Temporal validation confirmed stable performance across both periods (AUROC 0.756 vs. 0.738).
Conclusions:
iDRS demonstrated superior discrimination over SOFA with high sensitivity and NPV, supporting its role as a bedside screening tool that complements clinician judgment in ICU discharge decision-making.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.