Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Sep 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 18, 2026 - Nov 13, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

In search of ambiguity: a codesign process to develop immersive scenarios to address social cognitive biases of forensic patients with schizophrenia.

  • Mathieu Dumont; 
  • Catherine Briand; 
  • Stéphane Potvin; 
  • Rosemarie Hamel; 
  • Stéphane Vial

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social-cognitive biases constitute an important therapeutic target among individuals with schizophrenia in forensic psychiatry. However, addressing these biases in treatment is challenging because they arise in context-specific situations and debiasing strategies can be difficult for patients to implement without support. The use of immersive technologies offers an opportunity to recreate ecologically valid situations in therapy, enabling the assessment and remediation of these biases. Nevertheless, creating such scenarios proves to be a challenge. Social cues must be carefully selected, balanced, and placed within the environment, otherwise the ambiguity of the scenario is lost. The end-users’ perspective should be taken into account throughout the design process to ensure that the scenarios elicit the expected reactions. There are few examples of participatory design approaches in forensic psychiatry, particularly when it comes to developing immersive scenarios.

Objective:

This project aims at proposing a thoughtful approach to the development of immersive scenarios for social cognitive training in forensic psychiatry and documenting participants' perceptions of this process.

Methods:

A codesign process was developed and implemented with a group of patients and a group of mental health practitioners. Various strategies were proposed to facilitate participant engagement in the process (brainstorming sessions, sketching the best ideas, staging of scenarios, etc.). The process was documented in a research journal, and participants’ experiences were explored through interviews at the end of the process.

Results:

The design process took a full year to complete and resulted in the creation of 3 immersive scenarios depicting ambiguous everyday situations that could lead to violence if misinterpreted. The design process was appreciated by all participants. Several patients have reported benefits from participating in the design process and most believe they have influenced the development of the scenarios.

Conclusions:

This project shows that developing ambiguous immersive scenarios for forensic psychiatry clients can be a long and demanding process. Nevertheless, it can lead to the creation of scenarios that are evocative and conducive to clinical work.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dumont M, Briand C, Potvin S, Hamel R, Vial S

In search of ambiguity: a codesign process to develop immersive scenarios to address social cognitive biases of forensic patients with schizophrenia.

JMIR Preprints. 09/09/2026:111655

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.111655

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/111655

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.