Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: May 30, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: May 31, 2018 - Jul 6, 2018
Date Accepted: Jul 6, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Association Between Advanced Care Management and Progression of Care Needs Level in Long-Term Care Recipients: Retrospective Cohort Study

Itoh S, Hikichi H, Murayama H, Ishimaru M, Ogata Y, Yasunaga H

Association Between Advanced Care Management and Progression of Care Needs Level in Long-Term Care Recipients: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2018;1(2):e11117

DOI: 10.2196/11117

PMID: 31518239

PMCID: 6716439

Association Between Advanced Care Management and Progression of Care Needs Level in Long-Term Care Recipients: Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Sakiko Itoh; 
  • Hiroyuki Hikichi; 
  • Hiroshi Murayama; 
  • Miho Ishimaru; 
  • Yasuko Ogata; 
  • Hideo Yasunaga

ABSTRACT

Background:

Long-term care insurance systems in Japan started a special senior care program overseen by qualified care managers (also known as advanced care managers). However, the relationship between advanced care management and outcomes in long-term care recipients remains unknown.

Objective:

We aimed to compare the outcome of long-term care recipients using facilities with advanced care management and conventional care management, in terms of care needs level progression.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Survey of Long-Term Care Benefit Expenditures in Japan. We identified those aged ≥65 years who were newly designated a care need level of 3, and received long-term care services between April 2009 and March 2014 in Tokyo. We compared survival without progression of care needs level between the groups, with and without advanced care management, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors affecting the outcomes were determined using a multivariable logistic regression model fitted with a generalized estimating equation.

Results:

Of 45,330 eligible persons, 12,903 (28.46%) received long-term care based on advanced care management. The average duration of progression-free survival was 17.4 (SD 10.2) months. The proportions of five-year cumulative progression-free survival were 41.2% and 32.8% in those with and without advanced care management, respectively. The group with advanced care management had significantly lower care needs levels (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI, 0.72-0.82, P<.001).

Conclusions:

Advanced care management was significantly associated with improved care needs levels.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Itoh S, Hikichi H, Murayama H, Ishimaru M, Ogata Y, Yasunaga H

Association Between Advanced Care Management and Progression of Care Needs Level in Long-Term Care Recipients: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2018;1(2):e11117

DOI: 10.2196/11117

PMID: 31518239

PMCID: 6716439

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.