Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Sep 3, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Understanding suicidal crises through digital safety plans in adolescents: a mixed-methods analysis embedded within the SmartCrisis-Teen study

  • Carmen Aguilar-Castillo; 
  • Adrián Alacreu-Crespo; 
  • Ainoa García-Fernández; 
  • Pilar A. Saiz; 
  • Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo; 
  • Sara Jiménez-Fernández; 
  • Grace Lisboa; 
  • Nieves María Portero-García; 
  • Philippe Courtet; 
  • Jorge López-Castroman; 
  • Enrique Baca-García; 
  • Alejandro Porras-Segovia

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital safety plans are increasingly used to support adolescents at risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours (SITBs), yet little is known about how young people personalize these tools or how they conceptualize suicidal crises.

Objective:

This study aimed to characterize the content and use of a smartphone-based safety plan among adolescents with recent SITBs.

Methods:

This mixed-methods study was embedded within the multicentre SmartCrisis-Teen randomized clinical trial. Forty-four adolescents (13–17 years) with a recent suicide attempt or non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) completed a personalized safety plan within the MEmind smartphone application. Open-ended responses across the seven safety plan domains, together with qualitative information on suicidal thoughts and behaviours, were analysed using conventional content analysis. Descriptive and exploratory quantitative analyses examined safety plan use during three months of follow-up.

Results:

Participants described suicidal experiences ranging from passive wishes to be dead to active suicide planning and preparatory behaviours. Cutting was the predominant form of NSSI, with a mean age at onset of 11.8 years. Childhood adversity was highly prevalent, and traumatic memories frequently reappeared as warning signs during suicidal crises, suggesting that childhood maltreatment may function not only as a distal risk factor but also as a proximal trigger. Most participants actively engaged with the safety plan, particularly the Reasons to live and External coping strategies sections. Safety plans were predominantly organized around interpersonal connectedness, behavioural coping strategies, and future-oriented motivations, with family and peers emerging as central protective resources.

Conclusions:

Adolescents conceptualize suicidal crises as experiences strongly shaped by interpersonal relationships, emotional distress, and behavioural coping. While the overall structure of the Safety Planning Intervention appears suitable for adolescents, its content should be developmentally tailored. These findings may inform the refinement of digital safety planning interventions for youth at high risk of suicidal behaviour.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Aguilar-Castillo C, Alacreu-Crespo A, García-Fernández A, Saiz PA, Peñuelas-Calvo I, Jiménez-Fernández S, Lisboa G, Portero-García NM, Courtet P, López-Castroman J, Baca-García E, Porras-Segovia A

Understanding suicidal crises through digital safety plans in adolescents: a mixed-methods analysis embedded within the SmartCrisis-Teen study

JMIR Preprints. 03/09/2026:110865

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.110865

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/110865

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.