Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Aug 28, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Validation of the Quality of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Instrument

  • Karen L. Fortuna; 
  • Melody S. Goodman; 
  • Jemar R. Bather; 
  • Glyn Elwyn; 
  • Danielle M. Joyner; 
  • Vedant N. Tapiavala; 
  • Taylor J. Rogers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Validated engagement quality instruments provide a practical starting point for evaluating engagement without imposing strict compliance metrics. Existing evaluations are predominantly qualitative and descriptive, limiting cross-study comparability and complicating efforts to assess engagement. Emerging efforts, such as the National Academy of Medicine’s work on community engagement measurement and the development of validated instruments such as the QPCOR, highlight a growing consensus that engagement should be evaluated not only in terms of participation or structure, but also by influence, accountability, and relational quality.

Objective:

To validate the Quality of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Instrument (QPCOR).

Methods:

Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up data from a national prospective cohort study of 330 U.S. patients and community partners. The 10-item QPCOR was validated across several metrics: descriptive statistics, item response characteristics, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity

Results:

The QPCOR items (1) measured related aspects of researcher partnership efforts (correlations ranged from 0.485 to 0.712), (2) differentiated between levels of perceived researcher effort (all discrimination values >2.550), (3) demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.418 to 0.555), and (4) exhibited convergent validity with other validated scales, including the Brief Research Engagement Survey Tool (r = 0.75, p<0.001), the Subjective Numeracy Scale (r = 0.48, p<0.001), and the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale (r = 0.48, p<0.001).

Conclusions:

The QPCOR provides a reliable, psychometrically validated instrument for measuring the quality of patient-centered outcomes research partnerships. This instrument advances the science of engagement through its inclusion as a standardized measure for patient-centered outcomes research. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fortuna KL, Goodman MS, Bather JR, Elwyn G, Joyner DM, Tapiavala VN, Rogers TJ

Validation of the Quality of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Instrument

JMIR Preprints. 28/08/2026:110688

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.110688

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/110688

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.