Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Digital Work Capacity Index: A Framework for Phenotyping Digital Work
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital and knowledge work now concentrates much of the global workforce in front of screens for most of the working day, an exposure associated with visual strain, musculoskeletal and postural load, adverse environmental conditions, and psychological strain. These burdens can erode the capacity to sustain productive work, yet they are typically captured only intermittently and through self-report. Digital phenotyping — the in-situ quantification of individual-level human phenotypes from personal digital devices — offers a route to continuous, in-context measurement, but has so far been developed almost entirely for smartphone-based behavioral and mental-health monitoring.
Objective:
We propose the Digital Work Capacity Index (DWCI), a framework that extends digital phenotyping to the physical, cognitive, and environmental demands of desk-based work. The framework is intended to serve two aligned aims: helping individual workers protect long-term health while sustaining the focus their work requires, and giving organizations a measurable path to reducing health-related productivity loss.
Methods:
We synthesize evidence across occupational health, environmental science, and affective computing to identify the signals that reflect health- and focus-related strain during desk work. From this basis we define the framework's two composite axes — a Health Score and a Focus Score — together with their constituent signals and each signal's reference ranges and sources, prioritizing explainability over black-box prediction.
Results:
The framework organizes desk-work strain into two transparent composites. The Health Score integrates signals of visual, postural, environmental, and affective load; the Focus Score integrates behavioral signals of engagement and attentional continuity. Because each composite is built from measures with defined reference ranges, the resulting scores can be traced back to their contributing signals rather than to an opaque model.
Conclusions:
By treating productivity as a function constrained by health, the DWCI provides a workplace-specific, explainable measurement layer for continuously estimating functional work capacity. We specify a within-person validation study through which the framework's components and composite scores can be empirically tested. This is a conceptual framework; empirical validation is future work, and no primary data are reported here.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.