Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: May 2, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: May 24, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018
Date Accepted: Jul 17, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Neurological Disorders in Central Spain, Second Survey: Pilot Study, Difficulties, and Findings
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Neurological Disorders in Central Spain, second survey (NEDICES-2) is a population-based, closed-cohort study that will include over 8000 subjects aged ≥55 years; it will also include a biobank.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate all major aspects of the NEDICES-2 (methods, database, screening instruments, and questionnaires, as well as interexpert rating of the neurological diagnoses) in each one of the planned areas (all of them in central Spain) and to test the possibility of obtaining biological samples from each participant.
Methods:
In this pilot study, a selection of patients and participants of the planned NEDICES-2 underwent face-to-face interviews including a comprehensive questionnaire on demographics, current medications, medical conditions, and lifestyle habits; biological samples (blood, saliva, urine, and hair) were also obtained. Furthermore, every participant was examined by a neurologist.
Results:
In this pilot study, 567 study participants were enrolled (196 from hospitals and 371 from primary care physicians lists). Of these 567, 310 completed all study procedures (questionnaires and the neurological evaluation). The study was time consuming for several primary care physicians. Hence, a few primary care physicians from some areas refused to participate, which led to a reconfiguration of study areas. In addition, the central biobank needed to be supplemented by local biobanks at local Spanish National Health System hospitals.
Conclusions:
Population-based epidemiological surveys, such as the NEDICES-2, require a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of all aspects of a future field study (population selection, methods and instruments to be used, neurological diagnosis agreement, and data collection).
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.