Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 2, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: May 5, 2018 - Aug 3, 2018
Date Accepted: Oct 10, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation

Rahman N, Wang DD, Ng SHX, Ramachandran S, Sridharan S, Khoo A, Tan CS, Goh WP, Tan XQ

Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation

JMIR Med Inform 2018;6(4):e10933

DOI: 10.2196/10933

PMID: 30578188

PMCID: 6320424

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation

  • Nabilah Rahman; 
  • Debby D Wang; 
  • Sheryl Hui-Xian Ng; 
  • Sravan Ramachandran; 
  • Srinath Sridharan; 
  • Astrid Khoo; 
  • Chuen Seng Tan; 
  • Wei-Ping Goh; 
  • Xin Quan Tan

Background:

Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a wealth of information that can support data-driven decision making in health care policy design and service planning. Although research using EMRs has become increasingly prevalent, challenges such as coding inconsistency, data validity, and lack of suitable measures in important domains still hinder the progress.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to design a structured way to process records in administrative EMR systems for health services research and assess validity in selected areas.

Methods:

On the basis of a local hospital EMR system in Singapore, we developed a structured framework for EMR data processing, including standardization and phenotyping of diagnosis codes, construction of cohort with multilevel views, and generation of variables and proxy measures to supplement primary data. Disease complexity was estimated by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Polypharmacy Score (PPS), whereas socioeconomic status (SES) was estimated by housing type. Validity of modified diagnosis codes and derived measures were investigated.

Results:

Visit-level (N=7,778,761) and patient-level records (n=549,109) were generated. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) codes were standardized to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) with a mapping rate of 87.1%. In all, 97.4% of the ICD-9-CM codes were phenotyped successfully using Clinical Classification Software by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Diagnosis codes that underwent modification (truncation or zero addition) in standardization and phenotyping procedures had the modification validated by physicians, with validity rates of more than 90%. Disease complexity measures (CCI and PPS) and SES were found to be valid and robust after a correlation analysis and a multivariate regression analysis. CCI and PPS were correlated with each other and positively correlated with health care utilization measures. Larger housing type was associated with lower government subsidies received, suggesting association with higher SES. Profile of constructed cohorts showed differences in disease prevalence, disease complexity, and health care utilization in those aged above 65 years and those aged 65 years or younger.

Conclusions:

The framework proposed in this study would be useful for other researchers working with EMR data for health services research. Further analyses would be needed to better understand differences observed in the cohorts.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rahman N, Wang DD, Ng SHX, Ramachandran S, Sridharan S, Khoo A, Tan CS, Goh WP, Tan XQ

Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation

JMIR Med Inform 2018;6(4):e10933

DOI: 10.2196/10933

PMID: 30578188

PMCID: 6320424

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.