Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Aug 8, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 10, 2026 - Oct 5, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Personalized Feedback to Improve Clinical Communication and Collaborative Care (IA-Coach): a Pilot Study

  • Assiya Sirbal; 
  • David Vicente Alvarez; 
  • Douglas Teodoro; 
  • Katerine S. Blondon

ABSTRACT

Background:

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by medical students to summarize content While these tools may enhance efficiency, concerns have been raised that reliance on them could impede the development of summarization skills, which are essential for effective clinical communication and patient safety (de-skilling).

Objective:

To describe the development and evaluation of a GenAI-based online platform designed to train users in clinical case summarization and handoff communication through personalized feedback.

Methods:

The platform incorporates two expert-validated clinical vignettes, each with gold standard summaries for 4 target audiences (supervising physician, nurse, patient and night-shift physician). Personalized feedback is generated across three domains: content relevance, structure (based on the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation [SBAR] framework), and language. Using a set of test summaries, multiple large language models (LLMs) were compared through a mixed-methods evaluation, yielding composite scores ranging from 7 (best performance) to 42 (worst performance).

Results:

Following two evaluation phases and iterative prompt optimization, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro emerged as the most reliable model, with a score of 11/42). The model consistently generated accurate, audience-appropriate feedback with few identified errors.

Conclusions:

The GenAI based platform developed in this study, powered by Google Gemini 2.5 Pro, provides high-quality feedback on clinical summaries. These findings underscore its potential as an educational tool to develop clinical communication skills. Further research should assess its effectiveness in improving learners’ summarization performance in real‑world educational settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sirbal A, Alvarez DV, Teodoro D, Blondon KS

Personalized Feedback to Improve Clinical Communication and Collaborative Care (IA-Coach): a Pilot Study

JMIR Preprints. 08/08/2026:109079

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.109079

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/109079

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.