Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 6, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 6, 2026 - Oct 1, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Access, Acceptability, Barriers and Preferences of a Digital Platform for Preventive Antenatal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Clinical guidelines recommend addressing modifiable risk factors throughout pregnancy; however, antenatal providers often face challenges delivering preventive care within routine appointments. A digital platform that allows pregnant people to receive preventive care alongside routine antenatal care may help address this gap.
Objective:
To assess pregnant people's access to, acceptability of, perceived barriers to, and preferences for a digital platform that provides preventive care alongside routine antenatal care, including exploratory analyses of priority population groups.
Methods:
Between May 2023 and May 2025, telephone and online surveys were conducted with pregnant people attending antenatal care in an Australian local health district. Data were analysed descriptively, with exploratory subgroup analyses for priority population groups.
Results:
A total of 4604 surveys were completed. Access to an internet-connected digital device was almost universal (99.6%), with similarly high access across priority population groups (98.7%-100.0%). Acceptability of receiving preventive care via a digital platform was high for health risk assessment (83.1%-87.7%), personalised information (75.2%-84.2%), and referral to support services (87.4%-89.2%). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants reported lower acceptability for completing assessments (73.9%-83.9%) and receiving information (66.9%-79.5%), whereas participants born in non-English-speaking countries reported higher acceptability for receiving personalised information (84.0%-92.0%) and referrals (87.2%-93.6%). Most participants reported no perceived barriers to platform use (66.2%); the most common barriers were time constraints (13.9%) and forgetting to complete tasks (11.0%). Preferences varied regarding assessment timing, frequency of use, communication methods, and information formats.
Conclusions:
A digital platform for preventive care appears highly accessible and acceptable to most pregnant people. Platform design should address identified barriers, accommodate varied user preferences, and be co-designed with priority population groups to support equitable implementation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.