Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 6, 2026 - Oct 1, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Making AI Agents Practical in Health Professions Education: An Implementation Framework
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI) agent systems can combine autonomous action, persistent memory, multistep planning, and dynamic tool use, representing a shift beyond conversational large language models. They are increasingly relevant to health professions education, yet practical implementation remains limited. A recent survey reported that 43% of United States health systems were piloting agentic AI, whereas only 3% had deployed agents in live workflows, underscoring both institutional interest and implementation challenges. Existing publications have largely described the capabilities, potential applications, and risks of AI agents, but educators still lack practical guidance for translating these capabilities into bounded, governable educational workflows. This Viewpoint presents an implementation framework for program directors, clerkship directors, simulation leaders, faculty developers, and associate deans. The framework guides educators in selecting appropriate use cases, defining agent roles and boundaries, identifying required data and tools, establishing human oversight, and evaluating educational value, safety, equity, and failure modes before scaling. We apply the framework to administrative coordination, adaptive tutoring, clinical reasoning coaching, simulated-patient practice, competency-based medical education portfolio synthesis, and faculty development. For each workflow, we specify the educational problem, bounded agent task, required data and tools, intended output, oversight model, validation metrics, and level of educational stakes. A worked example illustrates how a simulated-patient agent can be configured, constrained, monitored, and evaluated. AI agents should be introduced in health professions education as bounded workflow supports rather than autonomous educational decision-makers. Programs should begin with low-stakes pilots, evaluate educational value and safety before expansion, and reserve decisions regarding assessment, wellness, remediation, progression, and promotion for human decision-makers
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.