Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 5, 2026 - Sep 30, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Electronic Patient Records as Information Infrastructures: Understanding the Persistence of Documentation Burden
ABSTRACT
Documentation burden for clinicians is persistent despite initiatives to reduce it. We present the concept of information infrastructures as a way of understanding this issue. Recognizing the electronic patient record (EPR) as an information infrastructure identifies key factors underlying documentation burden: the multiplicity of documentation requirements from non-clinical EPR users, including managers, regulators, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools; evolution of requirements over time and requirements due to long-term data uses; clarity required when sharing documentation across organizational boundaries; and limited electronic efficiencies in EPR design due to paper-era logics. Reframing documentation burden as an issue of information infrastructure suggests designers should challenge inherited assumptions within the EPR and develop innovative ways of reconciling requirements of clinical and non-clinical users. Policymakers should recognize documentation burden risks associated with AI. Researchers wanting to understand causes of documentation burden should undertake ethnographies that extend beyond the hospital ward.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.