Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 10, 2026 - Oct 5, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Missing Data or Missed Care? A Qualitative Study of Inpatient Insulin Management Workflows to Inform Knowledge Graph Development

  • Victoria L Tiase; 
  • Rachel Lee; 
  • Carolyn Scheese; 
  • Kenrick Cato; 
  • David Albers; 
  • Sarah C Rossetti

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems in health care increasingly rely on electronic health record (EHR) data for predictive modeling. However, EHR data often fail to capture real-world nursing workflows and clinical reasoning. In inpatient settings, gaps in glucose management documentation may reflect either care delivered but not documented (missing data) or care not delivered (missed care), yet these scenarios appear indistinguishable in EHR data. Without understanding how care is delivered, AI models may misclassify missing documentation as missed care, reducing accuracy and creating safety risks.

Objective:

To explore how inpatient nurses manage and document insulin-related care, informing clinical knowledge graphs of nursing decision-making.

Methods:

We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups with inpatient registered nurses across the United States. Data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive–inductive approach informed by the Theory of Missed Nursing Care, with GPT-assisted thematic synthesis reviewed by nurse experts.

Results:

Nineteen nurses participated across 10 sessions. Six themes explained why EHR gaps arise and are misinterpreted: (1) technology friction and interoperability gaps; (2) competing demands forcing documentation workarounds; (3) clinical decisions adjusting to mealtime variability; (4) informal, undocumented communication; (5) under documented but necessary protocol deviations; and (6) narrative documentation supplementing inadequate structured fields.

Conclusions:

Documentation gaps often reflect adaptive, context-dependent nursing work rather than missed care. Structured EHR fields fail to capture workarounds and informal reasoning, meaning AI models built without domain expertise risk conflating undocumented care with absent care, threatening both accuracy and patient safety. Inpatient insulin management is context-dependent and cannot be reliably interpreted without adequate domain expertise. Distinguishing missing data from missed care requires representing these dependencies explicitly, offering a practical foundation for safer, more interpretable AI models built on nurse-generated EHR data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tiase VL, Lee R, Scheese C, Cato K, Albers D, Rossetti SC

Missing Data or Missed Care? A Qualitative Study of Inpatient Insulin Management Workflows to Inform Knowledge Graph Development

JMIR Preprints. 03/08/2026:108601

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.108601

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/108601

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.