Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jul 30, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 30, 2026 - Sep 24, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Remote Asynchronous Smartphone Five Times Sit-to-Stand Testing in Older Adults: A Validity Trial

  • Ethan Berry; 
  • Lawrence Hayes; 
  • Ashley Warner; 
  • Nicholas Sculthorpe

ABSTRACT

Background:

Sarcopenia and age-related declines in muscle function threaten independence and increase falls risk in community dwelling older adults. Muscle strengthening exercise delivered via mobile health (mHealth) apps could help address access barriers, but scalable programs require valid remote assessments of lower limb function. The five times sit to stand test (5TSTS) is a well established indicator of lower limb strength and functional capacity, yet its validity in asynchronous, smartphone video formats remains unclear.

Objective:

To examine agreement, reliability, and concurrent validity of a smartphone recorded, asynchronously scored 5TSTS compared with laboratory 5TSTS and isokinetic knee extensor strength in community dwelling older adults.

Methods:

Thirty-four older adults aged >60 years attended a single laboratory visit for isokinetic dynamometry of dominant limb knee extensors and standardized 5TSTS testing, then completed a home based 5TSTS after a >3 day wash out, recording the test on their own smartphone. Videos were timed offline by the lead author (EB) using video analysis software. Agreement between laboratory and remote 5TSTS was assessed using Bland Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); reliability and measurement error were quantified via ICC, coefficient of variation percentage (CV%), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level MDC95. Pearson correlations examined associations between bodyweight normalized peak torque and both 5TSTS measures.

Results:

Twenty nine participants provided complete laboratory and remote data. Remote 5TSTS times were, on average, 0.3 s faster than laboratory values, with 95% limits of agreement −2.24 to 2.84 s. No obvious proportional bias was observed. Reliability metrics indicated good consistency (ICC = 0.89), good repeatability (CV = 7%), SEM = 0.9 s, and MDC95 = 2.5 s. Both laboratory and remote 5TSTS showed moderate negative correlations with normalized knee extensor torque, indicating that greater strength was associated with faster performance in both conditions.

Conclusions:

Asynchronous smartphone video 5TSTS demonstrates acceptable agreement with laboratory assessment, good reliability, and moderate concurrent validity with isokinetic knee extensor strength. This supports its use as a pragmatic remote tool for monitoring progress within mHealth muscle strengthening programs for community dwelling older adults. Clinical Trial: The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF), which included full details on study design, approach, and data analysis plan prior to the commencement of recruitment and data collection.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Berry E, Hayes L, Warner A, Sculthorpe N

Remote Asynchronous Smartphone Five Times Sit-to-Stand Testing in Older Adults: A Validity Trial

JMIR Preprints. 30/07/2026:108345

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.108345

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/108345

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.