Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Apr 18, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 20, 2018 - Jun 15, 2018
Date Accepted: Mar 31, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative Study

Hamshaw RJT, Barnett J, Gavin J, Lucas JS

Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative Study

Interact J Med Res 2019;8(2):e10812

DOI: 10.2196/10812

PMID: 31254334

PMCID: 6625221

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative Study

  • Richard James Thomas Hamshaw; 
  • Julie Barnett; 
  • Jeff Gavin; 
  • Jane S Lucas

Background:

Seeking and sharing information are the primary uses of the internet and social media. It is therefore vital to understand the processes individuals go through when engaging with information on these diverse platforms, especially in areas such as health- and risk-related information. One important element of such engagement is evaluating and attributing expertise to others.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore how meanings around expertise in relation to food allergy and intolerance (food hypersensitivity) were constructed by 2 groups of social media users: (1) those who use platforms for reasons relating to food hypersensitivity and (2) those seen as experts by this community.

Methods:

Survey participants were asked open-ended questions to identify potential experts in food hypersensitivity issues on social media and to discuss their reasoning for their choices (n=143). Subsequently, 8 adult social media users with experience of managing food hypersensitivity and 5 participants designated as experts by those users took part in email interviews. Survey and interview data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach.

Results:

Judging expertise on social media is a complex and multifaceted process. Users might be judged as experts through their professional background or their experience living with food hypersensitivities. How users behave on social media and the traces of their Web-based activity can influence how others will see them. Such considerations are both measured and moderated through the social media community itself. Findings highlighted how social media often act as a supportive information tool following a diagnosis, but this also raised concerns regarding the scenario of patients not being able to access suitable vetted information.

Conclusions:

This work has implications for understanding how users perceive expertise on social media in relation to a health concern and how information assessments are made during the management of risks. Findings provide practical insights to both medical and organizational stakeholders involved in the support of those living with life-changing conditions, such as food hypersensitivities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hamshaw RJT, Barnett J, Gavin J, Lucas JS

Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative Study

Interact J Med Res 2019;8(2):e10812

DOI: 10.2196/10812

PMID: 31254334

PMCID: 6625221

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.