Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Date Submitted: Jul 23, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 24, 2026 - Sep 18, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Capturing the Lived Experience of Fatigue Through Integration of Wearable, Environmental, and Patient-Reported Data: A Remote Digital Health Observational Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Fatigue is a common, debilitating symptom across many chronic and post-acute conditions, yet it remains difficult to assess in routine care due to its subjective, fluctuating, and context-dependent nature. Conventional fatigue assessments rely primarily on retrospective self-report measures, which lack temporal resolution and ecological validity. Advances in digital health technologies create new opportunities to capture fatigue as it is experienced in daily life through continuous, remote, and patient-centred data collection.
Objective:
This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a fully remote digital health platform that integrates wearable sensing, environmental monitoring, cardiorespiratory physiology, and ecological momentary assessment to capture the lived experience of fatigue in everyday life.
Methods:
The Understanding Patterns of Fatigue in Health and Disease study (NCT05622669) was a fully remote mixed-methods observational study. Participants with long COVID, myeloma, heart failure, and healthy controls completed either 2 or 4 weeks of monitoring. Data were collected using a wrist-worn wearable bracelet, in-home Bluetooth environmental beacons, a chest-worn ECG patch, and a smartphone application delivering ecological momentary assessments of fatigue. Data streams were integrated into unified visual representations combining activity, sleep, location, physiology, and self-reported symptoms. Feasibility was evaluated through recruitment, retention, adherence, and data completeness. Acceptability and interpretability were assessed through end-of-study interviews and optional participant feedback sessions.
Results:
Forty participants were enrolled and 37 completed study monitoring (retention rate 92.5%). Wearable bracelet data were available for 87% of study days, with adherence reaching 93% during periods of device operation. Ecological momentary assessments were completed on 83% of study days, whereas ECG patch data completeness averaged 72%. Twenty-two participants participated in feedback sessions. Participants reported high acceptability of the remote study procedures and considered the integrated visualisations to be plausible representations of their daily routines and symptom experiences. Contextual information derived from room-level location and environmental monitoring improved interpretation of activity and physiological data, enabling identification of behavioural patterns associated with work schedules, treatment cycles, and daily functioning that would not have been apparent from wearable-derived measures alone.
Conclusions:
A fully remote digital health platform integrating wearable, environmental, physiological, and self-reported data was feasible and acceptable across diverse populations experiencing fatigue. The integration of contextual information with behavioural and physiological monitoring enabled interpretable representations of daily life that participants recognised as meaningful reflections of their lived experience. These findings provide methodological guidance for future digital health studies and support the development of context-aware approaches to fatigue assessment and digital phenotyping in real-world settings. Clinical Trial: NCT05622669: Understanding Patterns of Fatigue in Health and Disease study (registered 17 November 2022)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.