Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jul 20, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 21, 2026 - Sep 15, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Attitudes Towards Digital Health Technology in Neurological Conditions: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Carers, and Healthcare Professionals

  • Sarah Fearn; 
  • John Spreadbury; 
  • Christopher Kipps

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health technology is increasingly applied across neurological conditions and is now widely accessible from both individual and formal healthcare perspectives. Nevertheless, comprehensive evidence on attitudes towards digital health technology in this population remains limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate attitudes towards digital health technology from the perspectives of people living with neurological conditions, carers, and healthcare professionals.

Methods:

An in-depth qualitative design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 35 participants (15 people with neurological conditions, 13 carers, 7 healthcare professionals) across multiple neurological conditions. Inductive thematic analysis, guided by a realist approach, was applied separately to each participant group.

Results:

Five themes emerged across all three groups: (1) openness to use; (2) digital literacy, experience, and ability to use; (3) hesitancy, uncertainty, and perception of benefit; (4) user age and access to technology; and (5) continued need for access to healthcare professionals. Participants were generally open to digital health technology but reported important caveats, including variable digital literacy, uncertainty about what to use and how, disappointment from previous failed attempts to use digital health technology, concerns about age-related access, and persistent preference for in-person clinical contact. Additionally, neurological symptoms were identified as a potential barrier to technology use, and a lack of awareness of available digital health tools was a consistent finding across all three groups.

Conclusions:

Most participants were open to the uptake and use of digital health technology. Attitudes around personal uncertainty, perception of benefit and a desire for continued access to healthcare professionals were combined with practical and structural factors, including digital literacy, equitable access, and usability. Developers and clinicians should prioritise co-designing simple, evidence-based digital tools that deliver tangible benefits whilst maintaining pathways for in-person care. Consideration should also be given to the potential impact of neurological symptoms on technology use and the need for proactive promotion of available tools to improve awareness amongst people with neurological conditions, carers, and healthcare professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fearn S, Spreadbury J, Kipps C

Attitudes Towards Digital Health Technology in Neurological Conditions: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Carers, and Healthcare Professionals

JMIR Preprints. 20/07/2026:107517

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.107517

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/107517

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.