Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jul 17, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 18, 2026 - Sep 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Patient Perspectives on an Electronic Health Record-based Very Low-Carbohydrate Nutrition Counseling Program: A Qualitative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Overweight and obesity are leading threats to individual health and the economy in the United States. Very low-carbohydrate diets can support weight loss and cardiometabolic health, but their translation into primary care remains limited by clinician knowledge gaps, limited visit time, and challenges supporting patients during dietary change. Digital health interventions embedded in the electronic health record may offer scalable strategies for delivering nutrition counseling in primary care.
Objective:
This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to patient engagement with Low Carb Journey, a fully automated electronic health record–based nutrition counseling program; barriers and facilitators to low-carbohydrate dietary adherence; and patient-recommended opportunities to improve the program’s content and delivery.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with adult patients enrolled in Low Carb Journey for at least 4 weeks within a large academic health system in the Midwestern United States. Participants were purposively sampled based on program task completion rate to include high engagers, defined as patients who completed at least 50% of assigned tasks, and low engagers, defined as patients who completed no more than 25% of assigned tasks. Interviews were conducted virtually, audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed using directed content analysis. The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
Results:
Of 151 invited patients, 22 completed interviews. Seventeen interviews were completed with high engagers and 5 with low engagers. Interview participants were predominantly female and White, and ages ranged from 27 to 74 years. Key barriers to Low Carb Journey engagement included technical challenges with the delivery platform and limited or unclear pre-enrollment counseling by clinicians. Facilitators of engagement included educational content, practical resources, and a supportive program structure. Barriers to low-carbohydrate dietary adherence included cravings for high-carbohydrate foods, social and household challenges, and misalignment of the diet with existing dietary restrictions, preferences, or financial constraints. Facilitators of dietary adherence included ease of finding low-carbohydrate foods, adoption of new dietary habits and routines, and motivation for long-term maintenance of dietary change. Participants recommended additional supplemental resources, preference-aligned dietary advice, less restrictive carbohydrate targets, and content that could be shared with others.
Conclusions:
Low Carb Journey offers a scalable approach for translating evidence-based very low-carbohydrate nutrition counseling into primary care. Findings highlight the importance of a user-friendly delivery platform, clear clinician communication at enrollment, practical and personalized educational content, and resources that accommodate diverse dietary needs, preferences, and financial constraints. Future work is needed to evaluate Low Carb Journey’s clinical effectiveness and refine strategies to personalize nutrition content while preserving scalability. Clinical Trial: NA
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.