Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jul 14, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 14, 2026 - Sep 8, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Mobile Health Platform for Remote Assessment of Physical Function in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Pilot Validation Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Kidney transplant candidates frequently experience declining physical function and frailty while awaiting transplantation. Although standardized functional assessments are routinely incorporated into transplant evaluation, they are generally limited to in-person clinic visits, creating challenges for longitudinal monitoring. Mobile health technologies may facilitate remote assessment of physical function; however, transplant-specific applications remain limited.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to develop and conduct a pilot evaluation of FIT Kidney, a transplant-specific mobile health application designed for remote assessment of physical function, and to evaluate its measurement agreement with standardized observer-based assessments and its usability among kidney transplant candidates.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center pilot study involving 24 adult kidney transplant candidates undergoing standardized physical function assessment. Participants completed the Sit-to-Stand (STS), Six-minute walk test (6MWT), and Timed-up-and-Go (TUG) while measurements were simultaneously recorded by FIT Kidney and trained observers. Agreement between application-derived and observer-derived measurements was evaluated using paired statistical testing, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Lin concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and Bland-Altman analyses. User experience was assessed using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).
Results:
Twenty-four participants (13 women and 11 men; mean age 61.0, SD 10.2 years; mean body mass index 27.4, SD 4.7 kg/m²) were enrolled. 22 participants completed the STS, 19 completed the 6MWT, and 18 completed the TUG. FIT Kidney demonstrated excellent agreement with observer measurements for the STS (ICC=0.945; CCC=0.943; P=.06) and 6MWT (ICC=0.956; CCC=0.954; P=.32). For the TUG, the application systematically overestimated completion time compared with observer assessment but maintained good agreement (ICC=0.794; CCC=0.794; P<.001). Participants reported positive usability ratings across UEQ domains of attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, and stimulation, while novelty received a neutral rating.
Conclusions:
This pilot study demonstrated that FIT Kidney achieved favorable measurement agreement with observer-based assessment for selected functional performance measures while receiving positive usability evaluations from kidney transplant candidates. These findings support the feasibility of transplant-specific mobile health technology for remote assessment of physical function. Larger multicenter studies conducted in home-based settings are needed to evaluate longitudinal performance, implementation, and potential integration into transplant care pathways. Clinical Trial: This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Institutional Review Board (H19-01405-A015).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.