Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 22, 2026 - Sep 16, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Optimal Postoperative Nutrition After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

  • Eiman Mohammed Alshammari; 
  • Sahar Ahmed; 
  • Fatima Othman Khair; 
  • Roaa Fahad M. Almehmadi; 
  • Yosra Abdullatif Mahmoud Adam Sabi; 
  • Raed Abdulrahman E. Alshamrani; 
  • Meshael Mohammed Alghaihab; 
  • Ahmad Ramzy Almaghrabi; 
  • Abdullah Abdulkarim Al-Humaid; 
  • Dana K. Al-Harbi; 
  • Rayhanah Abdullah Alsalman; 
  • Ahmad Issa AlAbdullah; 
  • Mohammed Mansour Aljarbou; 
  • Mazen Issa Alabdullah; 
  • Yazan Issa Alabdullah

ABSTRACT

Background:

The optimal postoperative nutritional strategy after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains uncertain, as available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compare heterogeneous feeding routes, formulas, and perioperative pathways.

Objective:

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of postoperative nutritional interventions using network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods:

We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 2026 for RCTs evaluating postoperative nutritional strategies in adults undergoing PD. Interventions were classified into nine network nodes: total parenteral nutrition (PN), nasojejunal tube standard enteral nutrition (NJT-SEN), feeding jejunostomy tube standard enteral nutrition (FJT-SEN), enteral immunonutrition (IN), early oral feeding (Early OF), supplemental PN, EN + PN, ERAS Protocol, and usual care. A frequentist NMA was performed, ranking the interventions by SUCRA.

Results:

Eighteen RCTs, including 1,932 patients, were included. For delayed gastric emptying, no pairwise comparison was significant; early oral feeding ranked highest (SUCRA=0.801), followed by supplemental parenteral nutrition and enteral immunonutrition. For overall postoperative complications, usual care increased risk versus feeding jejunostomy-based standard enteral nutrition (RR=2.37, 95% CI 1.17–4.83), while enteral immunonutrition ranked highest (SUCRA=0.889). Most secondary comparisons were not significant. Early oral feeding was associated with higher infectious complications (RR=2.11, 95% CI 1.17–3.81) and pulmonary complications (RR=2.86, 95% CI 1.07–7.63) versus FJT-SEN. Combined EN+PN prolonged hospital stay (MD=16.80 days, 95% CI 2.08–31.52).

Conclusions:

Postoperative nutrition after PD should be individualized. Enteral IN and FJT-SEN showed favorable comparative profiles, whereas early OF may be appropriate for selected patients but requires caution due to higher infectious and pulmonary complications in this network.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mohammed Alshammari E, Ahmed S, Khair FO, Almehmadi RFM, Adam Sabi YAM, Alshamrani RAE, Alghaihab MM, Almaghrabi AR, Al-Humaid AA, Al-Harbi DK, Alsalman RA, AlAbdullah AI, Aljarbou MM, Alabdullah MI, Alabdullah YI

Optimal Postoperative Nutrition After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

JMIR Preprints. 11/07/2026:106801

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.106801

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/106801

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.