Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 17, 2026 - Sep 11, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Artificial intelligence preparedness in cardiovascular training: A global systematic review of educational gaps, implementation barriers, and learner readiness

  • Sarah Hamid; 
  • Natasha Sheheryar; 
  • Umair Malik

ABSTRACT

Background:

This systematic review focuses on the existing literature examining awareness, attitudes, knowledge, preparedness, and educational needs related to AI among healthcare trainees and early-career professionals, within the context of cardiovascular medicine. By evaluating previous studies that have explored the gap between technological advancement and workforce readiness, this review aims to identify existing barriers, knowledge deficits, and opportunities for curriculum development.

Objective:

To synthesize the global evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) preparedness, educational gaps, and implementation barriers relevant to cardiovascular training and identify priorities for future curriculum development.

Methods:

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261443547). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ERIC were searched for English-language studies published between 2018 and 2026 evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) preparedness, educational gaps, and implementation barriers among cardiology trainees and healthcare professionals. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and resolved disagreements by consensus. Extracted outcomes included AI knowledge, confidence and preparedness, clinical exposure, educational needs, formal curriculum availability, and barriers to AI implementation in cardiovascular training.

Results:

Results:

Only a small number of studies focused exclusively on cardiology-specific populations, including cardiology residents, board-certified cardiologists, clinicians working in cardiology departments, and cardiology fellows. These studies similarly reported enthusiasm regarding AI integration into cardiovascular care, but highlighted significant concerns regarding inadequate educational preparation, limited hands-on experience, ethical considerations, and uncertainty regarding future clinical applications.

Conclusions:

This review demonstrates that the gap between enthusiasm for AI and implementation readiness is a consistent global finding. Strengthening cardiology-specific AI education through evidence-based curricula and targeted educational research will be essential to prepare future cardiologists for AI-enabled clinical practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hamid S, Sheheryar N, Malik U

Artificial intelligence preparedness in cardiovascular training: A global systematic review of educational gaps, implementation barriers, and learner readiness

JMIR Preprints. 12/07/2026:106797

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.106797

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/106797

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.